2016
DOI: 10.5455/ijmsph.2016.26022016400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-sectional study on availability and affordability of some essential child-specific medicines in Uttar Pradesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodologically, 15 (68.2%) studies used standardized WHO/HAI methodology, [ 14 , 16 18 , 20 , 22 26 , 30 – 34 ] 2 (9.1%) studies used adapted WHO/HAI method, [ 13 , 29 ] and the remaining 5 (22.7%) studies used other methods. [ 15 , 19 , 21 , 27 , 28 ] The mean number of essential medicines investigated was 31 (range: 5 to 121).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methodologically, 15 (68.2%) studies used standardized WHO/HAI methodology, [ 14 , 16 18 , 20 , 22 26 , 30 – 34 ] 2 (9.1%) studies used adapted WHO/HAI method, [ 13 , 29 ] and the remaining 5 (22.7%) studies used other methods. [ 15 , 19 , 21 , 27 , 28 ] The mean number of essential medicines investigated was 31 (range: 5 to 121).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 , 19 , 23 , 24 ] It is unclear that if the sample size was adequate in nineteen studies (86.4%), 13–19, 21–[ 24 , 26 – 31 , 33 ]–[ 34 ] and coverage of the identified sample was sufficient in eleven studies (50.0%). [ 14 , 16 18 , 21 , 22 , 25 27 , 29 ], 31 The criteria and results of quality assessment for each study were shown in Supplementary Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%