2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5114722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross Sections for Electron Collisions with NO, N2O, and NO2

Abstract: Cross section data are compiled from the literature for electron collisions with oxides of nitrogen (N x O y ) molecules: the species nitric oxide (NO), nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) are explicitly considered. Cross sections are collected and reviewed for total scattering, elastic scattering, momentum transfer, excitations of rotational, vibrational and electronic states, dissociation, ionization, and dissociative attachment. For each of these processes, the recommended values of the cross… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
(277 reference statements)
8
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar calculations for NF 3 (for five rotational transitions) (see [41]), showed clearly the resonant state at about 2 eV. This is also the case of the shape resonance in N 2 O, well pronounced in the rotation-elastic channel, for all j = 1 → j = 1 − 5 transitions (see [39]). In contrast, no resonance appears in the same channels in NO 2 between 0.2 and 3 eV, even though an alternative calculation [81] claimed two sharp resonances in the elastic cross section.…”
Section: Other Processessupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar calculations for NF 3 (for five rotational transitions) (see [41]), showed clearly the resonant state at about 2 eV. This is also the case of the shape resonance in N 2 O, well pronounced in the rotation-elastic channel, for all j = 1 → j = 1 − 5 transitions (see [39]). In contrast, no resonance appears in the same channels in NO 2 between 0.2 and 3 eV, even though an alternative calculation [81] claimed two sharp resonances in the elastic cross section.…”
Section: Other Processessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The IEECS derived from measurements of transport coefficients [39,73] show identical energy dependence (see Fig. 8), but are a few times higher.…”
Section: Electronic Excitationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generated in atmospheric plasma from chemical reactions of nitrogen with oxygen, NO and its radicals are very important in many industrial technologies [1][2][3][4][5] and play a key role in the combustion of fossil fuels [6,7]. Of the nitrogen oxide compounds, the so-called NOx gasses, the NO molecule has the greater impact on environment and on pollution caused by human activities [8,9].In order to make kinetic plasma models involving nitric oxide, many sets of molecular data [10][11][12], spectroscopic properties [13][14][15] and reaction rate coefficients [16][17][18][19] are available in the literature but, in spite of its importance, none of them provide complete data on electron impact dissociation. More specifically, rate constants for electron-NO reactions, both theoretical [14,[20][21][22] and experimental [23][24][25][26][27], exist only for vibrational excitation and dissociative electron attachment processes at low-energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, rate constants for electron-NO reactions, both theoretical [14,[20][21][22] and experimental [23][24][25][26][27], exist only for vibrational excitation and dissociative electron attachment processes at low-energy. A recent compilation of all the known electron collision cross sections is given by Song et al [16].To fill this gap, we present calculations -based on the formalism used previously [20] -of vibrational state resolved cross sections and the corresponding rate coefficients for dissociative excitation (DE) of NO by electron impact, i.e. :We consider electron collision energies where numerous NO − resonances exist, direct dissociation is negligible and the DE reaction is dominated by resonant processes [28,29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%