2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2022.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossed high alcohol preferring mice exhibit aversion-resistant responding for alcohol with quinine but not footshock punishment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the results with quinine were inconclusive in Sry + mice, and to determine whether the Sry + mice are resistant to other punishments, we tested a subset of mice with a 0.35 mA footshock. We have previously found that this amplitude of footshock reduces responding for EtOH in male but not female C57BL/6 J mice ( 56 ) as well in both sexes in the selectively bred crossed High Alcohol Preferring line of mice ( 57 ). As all FCG mice reduced their responding on the footshock session, we conclude that any insensitivity to punishment in this line may be specific to quinine, although this portion of the study should be considered exploratory considering that only a subset of mice were tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the results with quinine were inconclusive in Sry + mice, and to determine whether the Sry + mice are resistant to other punishments, we tested a subset of mice with a 0.35 mA footshock. We have previously found that this amplitude of footshock reduces responding for EtOH in male but not female C57BL/6 J mice ( 56 ) as well in both sexes in the selectively bred crossed High Alcohol Preferring line of mice ( 57 ). As all FCG mice reduced their responding on the footshock session, we conclude that any insensitivity to punishment in this line may be specific to quinine, although this portion of the study should be considered exploratory considering that only a subset of mice were tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we adequately powered our experiments to be able to detect sex differences, yet we did not see many sex specific effects. Female mice (C57BL/6J, high alcohol preferring (HAPs), or cHAP) typically drink more alcohol than their male counterparts (Bauer, Garcy, Boehm, 2020; Bauer, McVey, & Boehm, 2021; Winkler & Grahame, 2023), though not always (Ardinger et al, 2021; Sneddon et al, 2022; Bauer et al, 2022a; 2022b). We found, what we have seen before, that cannulated mice do not show sex differences in basal alcohol drinking (Figures 1B and 2B).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This selective breeding affords an opportunity to assess whether mechanistic changes in brain function occur as a function of a family history of high alcohol consumption which may offer insight into the neurobiology of AUD. For example, cHAP mice display compulsive-like alcohol drinking much faster and to more concentrated levels of quinine-adulterated alcohol (Houck et al, 2019;Sneddon et al, 2022), than other mouse models (see Table 1 in Bauer et al, 2021 for . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license available under a (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 2 weeks following response training, a subset of mice who were punished with the 0.25 mA shock ( n = 14, male = 7, female = 7) underwent a footshock sensitivity test using the flinch, jump, and vocalize paradigm (modified after Kim et al, 1991; Shuh et al, 2022). Flinch was operationalized as an observable reaction to the shock (lifting or shaking their paws or directing their attention toward the grid floor).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%