2022
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphys.13.3.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossing Symmetric Spinning S-matrix Bootstrap: EFT bounds

Abstract: We develop crossing symmetric dispersion relations for describing 2-2 scattering of identical external particles carrying spin. This enables us to import techniques from Geometric Function Theory and study two sided bounds on low energy Wilson coefficients. We consider scattering of photons, gravitons in weakly coupled effective field theories. We provide general expressions for the locality/null constraints. Consideration of the positivity of the absorptive part leads to an interesting connection with the re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More concretely, keeping spins up to j seems to be enough until s ≲ j+1 in the range of energies plotted in the above figure. A version of low-spin dominance was previously observed in field theory and tree-level string scattering, where only spin-0 dominates across all energies [35,36], see also [37].…”
Section: Low-spin Dominancementioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More concretely, keeping spins up to j seems to be enough until s ≲ j+1 in the range of energies plotted in the above figure. A version of low-spin dominance was previously observed in field theory and tree-level string scattering, where only spin-0 dominates across all energies [35,36], see also [37].…”
Section: Low-spin Dominancementioning
confidence: 60%
“…We checked up to s < 1 that low-spin dominance also occurs for the Möbius strip, non-planar annulus, and torus topologies. A version of low-spin dominance was previously observed at tree-level and in field theory amplitudes, albeit with only spin-0 dominance [35,36], see also [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…As discussed in section 4, this is not a problem in the eikonal regime (where polynomial behaviour under crossing is not expected), but if a causal crossing-symmetric unitary UV-completion exists for this amplitude, it must -after crossing -regulate the exponential divergence coming from the cosine and sine functions. One could also try to crossing-symmetrize the amplitude by hand, and see if the low energy expansion coefficients satisfy positivity constraints [77][78][79][80][81][82][83]. However, it turns out that the resulting amplitude does not possess enough of these low energy coefficients to draw a conclusion on this point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note also that this amplitude does not have sufficiently many terms in its Laurent expansion to be checked against positivity constraints (cf., [77][78][79][80][81][82][83]), though it would be interesting to further explore this using 'reverse bootstrap' ideas [84] or the non-projective EFT-hedron [85]. Since it is fair to expect that our amplitude will show signs of acausal behaviour (due to its relation to over-spun Kerr), it could suggest derivations for further positivity constraints which could be used to discard the amplitude on causality grounds.…”
Section: Born Amplitudementioning
confidence: 98%
“…[7,8]. Recently, similar bounds [13,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36] were organized into a novel geometric structure termed the EFT-hedron [14] (see also refs. [15,18,37]), related to the Weak Gravity Conjecture [38][39][40], the analytic bootstrap in AdS/CFT [16,41], and applied to the Standard Model EFT and pion scattering [42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Jhep01(2023)113mentioning
confidence: 99%