Crossing the Binaries of Mobility Control: Agency, Force and Freedom

Abstract

This article draws on qualitative data on journeys to Europe or Brazil undertaken by adults and teenagers from Sub-Saharan African countries to develop a conceptual analysis of the blurriness of the lines drawn between supposedly different types of movement via referencing the conceptual binary of forced/voluntary movement (such as asylum, trafficking, smuggling). It questions the liberal model of ‘agency’ that is employed not just by state actors, but also by many antislavery, anti-trafficking, child rights, and refugee rights activists, to construct boundaries between different ‘types’ of people on the move. Conceptual divisions between refugees and economic migrants, trafficked and smuggled persons, forced and voluntary labourers, child and adult migrants, and the idea of ‘modern slavery’, deflect attention from the structures that limit the choices open to people on the move. This article argues that the voluntary/forced binary encourages a tendency to falsely conflate choice with freedom and works to preserve the illusion that human freedom is a defining feature of liberal democratic societies rather than working to universally protect the freedoms of actual living human beings.

Migrant farmworkers: Resisting and organising before, during and after COVID‐19

“…The workers are positioned as conscious and active agents of their labour, who knowingly and willingly ‘pay the price’ to be free from ‘legal servitude’. Their paper adds to the rich historical scholarship articulating fugitivity and absconding as forms of resistance that, in their own way, complicate and undermine power (Hartman & Best, 2005; Martins Junior & O'Connell‐Davidson, 2022; Venkatesh, 2023).…”