Crossing the Golden Training Divide: The Science and Practice of Training World-Class 800- and 1500-m Runners

Abstract

Despite an increasing amount of research devoted to middle-distance training (herein the 800 and 1500 m events), information regarding the training methodologies of world-class runners is limited. Therefore, the objective of this review was to integrate scientific and best practice literature and outline a novel framework for understanding the training and development of elite middle-distance performance. Herein, we describe how well-known training principles and fundamental training characteristics are applied by world-leading middle-distance coaches and athletes to meet the physiological and neuromuscular demands of 800 and 1500 m. Large diversities in physiological profiles and training emerge among middle-distance runners, justifying a categorization into types across a continuum (400–800 m types, 800 m specialists, 800–1500 m types, 1500 m specialists and 1500–5000 m types). Larger running volumes (120–170 vs. 50–120 km·week−1 during the preparation period) and higher aerobic/anaerobic training distribution (90/10 vs. 60/40% of the annual running sessions below vs. at or above anaerobic threshold) distinguish 1500- and 800-m runners. Lactate tolerance and lactate production training are regularly included interval sessions by middle-distance runners, particularly among 800-m athletes. In addition, 800-m runners perform more strength, power and plyometric training than 1500-m runners. Although the literature is biased towards men and “long-distance thinking,” this review provides a point of departure for scientists and practitioners to further explore and quantify the training and development of elite 800- and 1500-m running performance and serves as a position statement for outlining current state-of-the-art middle-distance training recommendations.

Road to Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games: Training Characteristics of a World Class Male Triathlete

“…There is a growing interest in the scientific literature for reporting top-class endurance athletes’ successful programs ( Ingham et al, 2012 ; Tnønessen et al, 2014 ; Rønnestad and Hansen, 2018 ; Tjelta, 2019 ; Haugen et al, 2021 ; Kenneally et al, 2021 ). Variables such as a total training volume, exercise intensity and training intensity distribution (TID) have been commonly analyzed in this kind of researches.…”

Biomechanics of World-Class 800 m Women at the 2017 IAAF World Championships

“…Racing over 800 m elicits both aerobic metabolism to its maximum power and anaerobic metabolism to its maximum capacity (Billat et al, 2009 ). Elite 800 m runners tend to adopt seahorse-shaped pacing (Casado et al, 2021 ), whereby a very fast start is followed by the slowest part of the race (between 200 and 400 m) and then a gradual increase in speed until the last 100 m. One interesting aspect of 800 m racing is thus that the athletes try to run their fastest speeds during the endspurt, when they are likely to be tiring and fatigue resistance is crucial (Haugen et al, 2021 ). The manner in which the 800 m is raced means that, in physiological terms, the two laps are quite different (Gamboa et al, 1996 ), and an appreciation of what mechanical changes occur between the first and second laps would therefore be valuable for athletes and coaches.…”

Epidemiology of NCAA Track and Field Injuries From 2010 to 2014

“…As described in previous literature, periodized training for T&F may be used for athletes to achieve peak fitness for their most important competitions, often during the outdoor season. 9,29 As T&F athletes progress toward their peak fitness and most important competitions, they may be less likely to report injuries due to fear of missing important meets during their peak fitness.…”