2016
DOI: 10.1163/22134808-00002488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crossmodal Correspondences: Four Challenges

Abstract: The renewed interest that has emerged around the topic of crossmodal correspondences in recent years has demonstrated that crossmodal matchings and mappings exist between the majority of sensory dimensions, and across all combinations of sensory modalities. This renewed interest also offers a rapidly-growing list of ways in which correspondences affect--or interact with--metaphorical understanding, feelings of 'knowing', behavioral tasks, learning, mental imagery, and perceptual experiences. Here we highlight … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a set of criteria would open up new paths to compare linguistic descriptions for different modalities and to investigate the linguistic basis of cross-modal correspondences (e.g. Bremner et al, 2013;Deroy & Spence, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a set of criteria would open up new paths to compare linguistic descriptions for different modalities and to investigate the linguistic basis of cross-modal correspondences (e.g. Bremner et al, 2013;Deroy & Spence, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of sensorimotor communication, an alternative to relying on action affordances could be relying on naturally occurring regularities in the physical and cultural environment. People exhibit consistent associations between stimuli features from different sensory modalities; for example, they consistently associate high-pitched sounds with small, bright, and sharp-edged objects (e.g., Hubbard, 1996;Marks, 1987Marks, , 1989; see also Deroy & Spence, 2016). These "crossmodal correspondences" (for a comprehensive review, see Spence, 2011) are based on natural statistical regularities (e.g., between the size of an object and its resonance frequency; Bee, Perrill, & Owen, 2000;Coward & Stevens, 2004), structural associations (e.g., between magnituderelated stimuli features such as size and loudness; Smith & Sera, 1992;Walsh, 2003), and semantically mediated associations (e.g., between auditory pitch and visual elevation; Martino & Marks, 1999; also see Walker & Walker, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light passes through the lens of the eye (crystalline) and is focused on the retina, where cells (cones -related to vision "in colour" when the luminosity is high, and rods -related to "black-and-white" vision in low light) convert light into electrical / neural impulses, which are sent to the brain through the optic nerve. The brain receives these impulses, processes them and interprets them as images of the objects seen [141]. The human eye can detect almost all gradations of colours when only red, green, and blue monochromatic lights are appropriately mixed in different combinations.…”
Section: Sightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three different plating proposals were produced, each one transmitting different inputs according to it characteristics, as angularity is associated to acidity, roundness with sweetness and organic shapes enhance the natural features on the plate [141].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%