2015
DOI: 10.1113/jp271039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CrossTalk opposing view: High intensity interval training does not have a role in risk reduction or treatment of disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that there are no data to suggest that HIT is inherently less safe to perform by patients than aerobic or resistance exercise, opponents of the use of HIT in patients maintain the argument that the high exercise intensities must make HIT less safe (Biddle & Batterham, 2015;Holloway & Spriet, 2015). It remains unknown whether the short-term increase in heart rate associated with high-intensity exercise (reaching ~90% of maximal heart rate in our study) is more or less of a risk compared to the more sustained longer-term increase in heart rate during aerobic exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that there are no data to suggest that HIT is inherently less safe to perform by patients than aerobic or resistance exercise, opponents of the use of HIT in patients maintain the argument that the high exercise intensities must make HIT less safe (Biddle & Batterham, 2015;Holloway & Spriet, 2015). It remains unknown whether the short-term increase in heart rate associated with high-intensity exercise (reaching ~90% of maximal heart rate in our study) is more or less of a risk compared to the more sustained longer-term increase in heart rate during aerobic exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who wish to perform HIIT should be clinically stable, have been participating at least in regular moderateintensity exercise, and likely be supervised at least initially (116). The risks with advanced disease are unclear (116), and continuous, moderate-intensity exercise may be safer (117). The optimal HIIT training protocol has yet to be determined.…”
Section: Recommended Physical Activity Participation For People With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, use of HIIT is controversial and debated, particularly in patients with pre-existing disease (Holloway & Spriet, 2015;Wisløff et al 2015). Regardless, the reported positive effects and potential of HIIT to provide greater access to the health benefits that exercise provides is exciting; although the lack of evidence to date examining how HIIT affects the brain raises concerns about its global promotion at this stage .…”
Section: B R a I N A Nd Co G N I T I V E H Ea Lthmentioning
confidence: 95%