2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowd response considering herd effect and exit familiarity under emergent occasions: A case study of an evacuation drill experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Kumar and Goyal (2016) defined that herding arise in the market when an investor does not have enough information and does not have certain knowledge to be relied upon for investment decision. Chen et al (2020) argued that herding tendency was observed because of lack of information or familiarity with the situation and on actions that have been done previously in the same situation. Due to lack of information of the investors involved in the habit of following other investors, they assume that they are better in processing the best option for investment in decision making.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Kumar and Goyal (2016) defined that herding arise in the market when an investor does not have enough information and does not have certain knowledge to be relied upon for investment decision. Chen et al (2020) argued that herding tendency was observed because of lack of information or familiarity with the situation and on actions that have been done previously in the same situation. Due to lack of information of the investors involved in the habit of following other investors, they assume that they are better in processing the best option for investment in decision making.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors can be mainly categorized into the internal, physical, and psychological characteristics and the external dynamic environment. More precisely, the internal factors mostly consist of gender, age, education level, health status, and familiarity with the surroundings (Chen, He, et al, 2020; Feliciani et al, 2020), while the external factors include travel distance, crowd distribution, congestion, visibility, and evacuation signage (Fu et al, 2021; Wu et al, 2021). All these factors contribute to the heterogeneity of individual exit choice preference in specific situations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22(c) shows that the spatial angle of 80° is consistent with the spatial angle of 0°, the most significant number of participants escaped from Exit 1, and the participants with the longest escape time escaped from Exit 1, and no participants escaped from Exit 3. This is because the participants are more familiar with Exit 1 and are more willing to escape to the exits they are familiar with during the escape process [53] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%