2018 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/dyspan.2018.8610487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourced Indoor Wi-Fi REMs: Does the Spatial Interpolation Method Matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This work is extended to study how Kriging behaves in the presence of propagation model uncertainties, that stem from shadowing [33]. Studies that consider the recovery of sparse coverage data in an indoor environment include [34], [35], [36]. Using low-cost spectrum sensors in an office indoor environment, authors in [34] present an accuracy comparison between the spatial interpolation methods of Kriging, Gradient Plus Inverse Distance Squared and Inverse Distance Weighted methods.…”
Section: ) Data Sparsity Onlymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work is extended to study how Kriging behaves in the presence of propagation model uncertainties, that stem from shadowing [33]. Studies that consider the recovery of sparse coverage data in an indoor environment include [34], [35], [36]. Using low-cost spectrum sensors in an office indoor environment, authors in [34] present an accuracy comparison between the spatial interpolation methods of Kriging, Gradient Plus Inverse Distance Squared and Inverse Distance Weighted methods.…”
Section: ) Data Sparsity Onlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that consider the recovery of sparse coverage data in an indoor environment include [34], [35], [36]. Using low-cost spectrum sensors in an office indoor environment, authors in [34] present an accuracy comparison between the spatial interpolation methods of Kriging, Gradient Plus Inverse Distance Squared and Inverse Distance Weighted methods. The results show that there is no significant difference in the accuracy for the considered interpolation methods, relative to the variability in the measurements reported by different low-cost devices.…”
Section: ) Data Sparsity Onlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its practicality, many researchers have investigated embedding an REM into wireless systems over the last decade, e.g., spectrum sharing over television white space (TVWS) [6], coverage prediction in cellular networks [7], and communication quality prediction in WLANs [8].…”
Section: A Kriging-based Radio Environment Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the proposed algorithm on real data, we consider an office environment with one WiFi AP, using the set-up and data from [43]. In the set-up, different sensing Raspberry PI boards (RPi3) are placed on the floor on a grid with inter-distance of 20cm.…”
Section: The Proposed Sensing Algorithm As a Remmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each node cooperates with neighboring nodes that are within 2m, and obtain w k (we drop the subscript m). Then, we use the simple inverse distance weighting spatial interpolation (IDW) method [43] at every j-th node in (S) c , which is expressed as w j = l∈S β lj w l ∀j ∈ (S) c , where here we set β lj to be inversely proportional to the distance squared between the j-th and l-th nodes [43].…”
Section: The Proposed Sensing Algorithm As a Remmentioning
confidence: 99%