2019
DOI: 10.1109/tnnls.2018.2890148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crowdsourced Label Aggregation Using Bilayer Collaborative Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any participant can use the network platform to improve ideas, solve problems, and get corresponding rewards. [21] proposed a novel bilayer collaborative clustering (BLCC) method for the label aggregation in crowdsourcing. [22] proposed a novel task bundling based incentive mechanism that dynamically bundles tasks with different popularity together to solve the participation unbalance problem.…”
Section: Poi Recommendation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any participant can use the network platform to improve ideas, solve problems, and get corresponding rewards. [21] proposed a novel bilayer collaborative clustering (BLCC) method for the label aggregation in crowdsourcing. [22] proposed a novel task bundling based incentive mechanism that dynamically bundles tasks with different popularity together to solve the participation unbalance problem.…”
Section: Poi Recommendation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guha et al (2015) and Chamberlain et al (2016) attempted to collect coreference annotations from non-expert crowd annotators. Even though crowd aggregation has been studied for many years, most existing studies have focused on aggregating classification labels (Dawid and Skene, 1979;Snow et al, 2008;Raykar et al, 2010;Hovy et al, 2013;Li et al, 2014;Felt et al, 2015;Zheng et al, 2017;Yin et al, 2017;Rodrigues and Pereira, 2018;Guan et al, 2018;Li et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019) or sequence labels (Hovy et al, 2014;Rodrigues et al, 2014;Huang et al, 2015;Nye et al, 2018;Lin et al, 2019). Note that Raykar et al (2010) and Felt et al (2015) also included contextual information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent work utilizes traditional clustering methods for truth inference [47]. The method succeeds on small datasets with well-formed clusters, but this may not be the case of large and sparse datasets where a few clusters corresponding to the label categories cannot separate the dataset well (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%