2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2006.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crust–mantle structure difference across the gravity gradient zone in North China Craton: Seismic image of the thinned continental crust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The newly constructed seismic images using the data from these dense arrays reveal significant regional variations in the crustal and lithospheric thickness of the NCC [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. In general, the eastern NCC has a thin crust (<35 km) and lithosphere (60-100 km).…”
Section: Geographical Extent Of the Ncc Destructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newly constructed seismic images using the data from these dense arrays reveal significant regional variations in the crustal and lithospheric thickness of the NCC [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. In general, the eastern NCC has a thin crust (<35 km) and lithosphere (60-100 km).…”
Section: Geographical Extent Of the Ncc Destructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contrasting structure demonstrates that the Tan-Lu fault zone was operated as a vertical lithospheric shear zone, inducing stress concentration and facilitating the NCC reactivation in the Mesozoic. The crustal structural imaging beneath several temporal seismic array profiles revealed that the low velocity zones occur throughout the crust, probably in association with the voluminous Mesozoic-Cenozoic magmatism of the region [30,31] . However, the asymmetrical and dispersive distribution of the low velocity zone, would not favor the tectonic pattern of mantle plume.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we constructed the P-and S-wave velocity models of the upper mantle at depths of 70-800 km by taking into account the recent results of high-resolution tomography [21] for the NCC, which presents velocity perturbation with respect to the IASPEI91 model as the background model. The influence of the crustal structure on the CCP image was then corrected by introducing the crustal velocity models above a depth of 70 km for each station derived from receiver function imaging [26][27][28][29]. This model is hereafter referred to as the NCC model.…”
Section: Receiver Function Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%