2015
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggv469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal and upper mantle structure beneath the northeastern Tibetan Plateau from joint analysis of receiver functions and Rayleigh wave dispersions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our current V SH model could provide more details on the QOB region with high station coverage compared to the previous V SH model (Li et al, ). Low velocities characterize the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the QOB and the SGT (Figures and ), which is consistent with the slow P wave velocity (Li et al, ; Lei & Zhao, ), slow SV wave velocity from earthquake surface wave tomography (Li et al, ) and from joint inversion of receiver functions and Rayleigh wave dispersions (Zheng et al, ). Li et al () also observed middle‐ to lower‐crustal low SV wave velocity in this area from ambient noise tomography.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, our current V SH model could provide more details on the QOB region with high station coverage compared to the previous V SH model (Li et al, ). Low velocities characterize the crust and uppermost mantle beneath the QOB and the SGT (Figures and ), which is consistent with the slow P wave velocity (Li et al, ; Lei & Zhao, ), slow SV wave velocity from earthquake surface wave tomography (Li et al, ) and from joint inversion of receiver functions and Rayleigh wave dispersions (Zheng et al, ). Li et al () also observed middle‐ to lower‐crustal low SV wave velocity in this area from ambient noise tomography.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The estimated crustal thicknesses were further interpolated into meshed 0.2° × 0.2° grids of the study area (Figure a). The crustal thickness varies from ∼65 km in the NETP to ∼40 km in the western NCC (Figure ), which is consistent with previous estimates from the H ‐ κ stacking method [e.g., Li et al ., , , ; Pan and Niu , ; Tian and Zhang , ; H. Wang et al ., ; Wang et al ., ; X. Wang et al ., ; W. Wang et al ., ; Xu et al ., ; Zheng et al ., ] and active‐source seismic profiles [e.g., Jia et al ., ; Liu et al ., ; Teng et al ., ; C. Y. Wang et al ., ; S. J. Wang et al ., ]. A difference in the Moho depth is observed from the QLT to Alxa block by as much as 10 km across the HF and NQF (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These general features agree well with previous studies [e.g., Bao et al ., ; Cheng et al ., ; Jiang et al ., ; Li et al ., , , ; Yang et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ; Zheng et al ., ]. For example, the LVZs in the northern SGT, southwestern WQT, and western QLT were also revealed by the surface wave tomography studies [ Bao et al ., ; Jiang et al ., ; Li et al ., , ], but at lower resolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations