2022
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggac084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal and uppermost mantle structure of the NW Namibia continental margin and the Walvis Ridge derived from ambient seismic noise

Abstract: The Walvis Ridge is the most prominent hotspot track related to the opening in the South Atlantic Ocean. Several hypotheses have been developed to explain its origin and evolution. The presence of a massive magmatic structure at the landfall of the Walvis Ridge (WR) in Northwest Namibia raised speculation about the role of a hotspot during the opening of the South Atlantic ocean. To investigate its deeper velocity structure at the junction of the Walvis Ridge with the African continent was the focus of the amp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From our results, we suppose that Walvis Ridge is an outcome of the combination of halted spreading and the impingement of the Tristan plume. However, the 3D extent of magmatism imaged in our models (which we do not discuss in this article, but in Franz et al, 2021 andJegen et al, 2016), confirms the observation, that the area of magmatic overprint is too small to justify the arrival of a large plume head (Fromm et al, 2017a;Ryberg et al, 2022) . An alternative model explains this smaller scale surface display of the plume by a large, lower mantle upwelling, which tops out at ~1000 km, from where smaller, secondary plumes rise to the surface (Courtillot et al, 2003;French & Romanowicz, 2015;Homrighausen et al, 2019;Zhao, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From our results, we suppose that Walvis Ridge is an outcome of the combination of halted spreading and the impingement of the Tristan plume. However, the 3D extent of magmatism imaged in our models (which we do not discuss in this article, but in Franz et al, 2021 andJegen et al, 2016), confirms the observation, that the area of magmatic overprint is too small to justify the arrival of a large plume head (Fromm et al, 2017a;Ryberg et al, 2022) . An alternative model explains this smaller scale surface display of the plume by a large, lower mantle upwelling, which tops out at ~1000 km, from where smaller, secondary plumes rise to the surface (Courtillot et al, 2003;French & Romanowicz, 2015;Homrighausen et al, 2019;Zhao, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our identifications derived from MT and gravity data are corroborated by seismic surveys (e.g. by Fromm et al, 2017;Planert et al, 2017;and Ryberg et al, 2022), pointing to the interesting possibility to derive large scale 3D models through acquisition of 3D MT and joint inversion with satellite gravity data and guiding 2D seismic acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations