1985
DOI: 10.1017/s0016756800034038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crustal growth of the Antarctic Peninsula by accretion, magmatism and extension

Abstract: A subduction-accretion model incorporating new geophysical data is presented to explain the geology of the Antarctic Peninsula from late Palaeozoic to Cenozoic time. According to the model, the peninsula consists of overlapping accretionary, magmatic and extensional regimes that were diachronous across the peninsula and have built the crust to its present form. The crust, which contains a small proportion of sialic basement, was mainly formed by accretionary and magmatic processes and modified to its present s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rifted or strike slip margin to the Weddell Sea Rift System may have been present in Jurassic times, or the NWMP structures may have extended into the region of the present day Antarctic Peninsula. However, overprinting by Cretaceous magmatism and orogenic processes largely obscures the older structures within the Antarctic Peninsula (Burton- Johnson and Riley, 2015;Storey and Garrett, 1985;Vaughan et al, 2012). In addition, the precise position of the Antarctic Peninsula relative to the WSRS in Jurassic times is not well constrained (Miller, 2007).…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rifted or strike slip margin to the Weddell Sea Rift System may have been present in Jurassic times, or the NWMP structures may have extended into the region of the present day Antarctic Peninsula. However, overprinting by Cretaceous magmatism and orogenic processes largely obscures the older structures within the Antarctic Peninsula (Burton- Johnson and Riley, 2015;Storey and Garrett, 1985;Vaughan et al, 2012). In addition, the precise position of the Antarctic Peninsula relative to the WSRS in Jurassic times is not well constrained (Miller, 2007).…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Antarctic Peninsula is the remnant of a continental-margin magmatic arc of MesozoicCenozoic age (Storey & Garrett 1985). Formed as a result of subduction of the palaeo-Pacific Plate beneath the western margin of the Antarctic Peninsula, it has good exposures of magmatic-arc, accretionary complex, and foreand back-arc regions.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Mesozoic and Cenozoic times, it has been affected by tectonic processes related to the subduction of the Phoenix plate (oceanic lithosphere from the southeastern Pacific Ocean) below the Antarctic and South American plates. Models for the tectonic evolution of the studied area generally consider diachronous crustal growth by accretion and magmatism in the overriding plate, which was almost continuous from the early Mesozoic Gondwanide to the late Mesozoic and Cenozoic Andean activities (e.g., Storey & Garrett, 1985;Vaughan & Storey, 2000), forming a coherent structural domain. The outcropping basement in northern Graham Land is formed by a turbidite complex of Late Carboniferous to ?Jurassic age, the Trinity Peninsula Group (TPG; e.g., Smellie, 1991;Hervé at al., 2006), representing a former active continental margin in the Antarctic plate.…”
Section: Introduction and Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%