2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2016.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New geophysical compilations link crustal block motion to Jurassic extension and strike-slip faulting in the Weddell Sea Rift System of West Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(217 reference statements)
4
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We model crust ∼35-40 km thick beneath the Haag Nunataks and northern Ellsworth Mountains decreasing to a thickness of ∼30-32 km beneath the Whitmore Mountains (Figures 10 and 11). These thickness estimates and their spatial variation are consistent with aerogravity and receiver function studies (e.g., Chaput et al, 2014;Jordan et al, 2010;Ramirez et al, 2017) and the recognition of distinct structural domains within the composite HEW block (e.g., Jordan et al, 2017;Storey & Dalziel, 1987). While the lateral variation patterns are consistent, Shen et al (2018) model slightly thicker crust at ∼40-44 km beneath the Haag Nunataks and northern Ellsworth Mountains ( Figure S6).…”
Section: Tectonic Interpretation Of V Sv Modelsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We model crust ∼35-40 km thick beneath the Haag Nunataks and northern Ellsworth Mountains decreasing to a thickness of ∼30-32 km beneath the Whitmore Mountains (Figures 10 and 11). These thickness estimates and their spatial variation are consistent with aerogravity and receiver function studies (e.g., Chaput et al, 2014;Jordan et al, 2010;Ramirez et al, 2017) and the recognition of distinct structural domains within the composite HEW block (e.g., Jordan et al, 2017;Storey & Dalziel, 1987). While the lateral variation patterns are consistent, Shen et al (2018) model slightly thicker crust at ∼40-44 km beneath the Haag Nunataks and northern Ellsworth Mountains ( Figure S6).…”
Section: Tectonic Interpretation Of V Sv Modelsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Seismic refraction (Leitchenkov & Kudryavtzev, ) and gravity and magnetic data (Jordan et al, ; Jordan et al, ) suggest the presence of extensive underplating at the base of the crust in the Weddell Sea Rift System, which Jordan et al () attribute to plume‐related Jurassic magmatism. O'Donnell et al () suggest that a subcrustal high shear wave velocity anomaly underlying the southern Weddell Sea Rift System might reflect depleted mantle lithosphere following the extraction of voluminous melt related to Gondwana breakup, that is, a fossil proto‐Weddell plume signature.…”
Section: Shear Wave (Vsv) Velocity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crustal structure introduces the greatest uncertainty as extrapolation of surface outcrops to half crustal thickness will overrepresent thin sedimentary basins and isolated plutons. Crustal structure may be resolvable through geophysical interpretation, as it has been in determining sedimentary thicknesses in the Weddell Sea region [ Golynsky and Aleshkova , ; Jordan et al ., ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To produce our Antarctic‐wide compilation of magnetic anomalies, we used (Table S1) the following: all the publicly available aeromagnetic data for the Antarctic continent and surrounding areas: ADMAP (Golynsky et al, ), WISE (Ferraccioli et al, ), AFI‐Coats Land (Bamber et al, ), AGAP (Ferraccioli et al, ), PPT (Studinger et al, ), ICECAP (Aitken et al, ), Central TAM (Goodge & Finn, ), and Weddell Sea (Jordan et al, ); a reprocessed version of a compilation over Dronning Maud Land (Mieth & Jokat, ) and ICEGRAV2013 (Forsberg et al, ); and satellite magnetic data from the Magnetic Field Model MF7 (MF7) (Maus, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%