2021
DOI: 10.1111/pace.14149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryoablation for pulmonary veins isolation in obese patients with atrial fibrillation compared to nonobese patients

Abstract: Background Pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) by cryoballoon (CB) ablation is marginally represented in clinical studies in obese patients. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CB‐PVI in a large cohort of overweight and obese patients from the 1STOP project. Methods From 2012 to 2018, 2048 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) (70% male, 59 ± 11 years; 75% paroxysmal AF) underwent index CB‐PVI. The patient data were separated into three cohorts for statistical evaluation, including… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the above-mentioned coherence of studies on the subject of obesity and cardiovascular disease, there are contradicting data on complication rates and the short- and long-term effectiveness of pulmonary vein isolation with regard to rhythm maintenance in obese patients. While some authors report reduced chances of success [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ] and/or increased complication rates, other authors report an equivalent effectiveness of PVI without increased complication rates [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. It is noteworthy that the difference in outcomes is partly based on the comparison of different ablation procedures or patient groups and morbidity burden variation [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the above-mentioned coherence of studies on the subject of obesity and cardiovascular disease, there are contradicting data on complication rates and the short- and long-term effectiveness of pulmonary vein isolation with regard to rhythm maintenance in obese patients. While some authors report reduced chances of success [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ] and/or increased complication rates, other authors report an equivalent effectiveness of PVI without increased complication rates [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. It is noteworthy that the difference in outcomes is partly based on the comparison of different ablation procedures or patient groups and morbidity burden variation [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They did not find a worse outcome during their follow-up among patients with increased BMI. Furthermore, they found persistent AF was an independent predictor of AF recurrence after ablation [29]. Data on suboptimal outcome after PVI in patients with persistent AF with respect to AF recurrence has been reported before [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, Malaspina et al [29] reported on more than 2000 patients who underwent CB PVI. They did not find a worse outcome during their follow-up among patients with increased BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies have investigated the influence of BMI on long‐term ablation outcomes. Malaspina et al 18 analyzed the outcome of cryoballoon PVI in 2048 patients, without reporting an impact of obesity grade on 12 months follow up. In contrast, Glover et al 19 investigated the impact of BMI on 3333 AF patients that were ablated with RF in a multicenter registry: Three groups were defined (BMI < 25, BMI: 25.5–29, and BMI ≥ 30) showing a worse outcome for patients with a BMI ≥ 30 compared to a BMI of 25.5–29.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies have investigated the influence of BMI on long-term ablation outcomes. Malaspina et al18 analyzed the outcome of cryoballoon PVI in 2048 patients, without reporting an impact of obesity grade on impact of BMI on 3333 AF patients that were ablated with RF in a multicenter registry: Three groups were defined (BMI < 25, BMI:25.5-29, and BMI ≥ 30) showing a worse outcome for patients with a BMI ≥ 30 compared to a BMI of 25.5-29. Winkle et al 11 divided 2715 AF patients who underwent RF ablation by BMI (<25, 25 to <30, 30 to <35, 35 to <40, ≥40) showing a negative impact of obesity on ablation outcomes when BMI exceeds 35.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%