2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4994170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryogenic LED pixel-to-frequency mapper for kinetic inductance detector arrays

Abstract: We present a cryogenic wafer mapper based on light emitting diodes (LEDs) for spatial mapping of a large microwave kinetic inductance detector (MKID) array. In this scheme, an array of LEDs, addressed by DC wires and collimated through horns onto the detectors, is mounted in front of the detector wafer. By illuminating each LED individually and sweeping the frequency response of all the resonators, we can unambiguously correspond a detector pixel to its measured resonance frequency. We have demonstrated mappin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous measurements of the group 1 resonators in this wafer found a relative frequency shift between resonators of order ∼ 1.5% with a mostly radial dependence 17 , similar to the spread in group 2 resonators. Figure 3(c) plots the measured frequency separation between adjacent resonators, ∆ = f n − f n−1 /f n .…”
Section: Test Array Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous measurements of the group 1 resonators in this wafer found a relative frequency shift between resonators of order ∼ 1.5% with a mostly radial dependence 17 , similar to the spread in group 2 resonators. Figure 3(c) plots the measured frequency separation between adjacent resonators, ∆ = f n − f n−1 /f n .…”
Section: Test Array Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Since the design ∆ of the group 1 resonators is smaller than the observed scatter of ∆ in group 2, we might expect shuffling of the frequency ordering of resonators in group 1 with respect to the designed serpentine pattern. By use of the recently developed LED pixel mapper 17 , we successfully mapped the measured resonator frequencies to the physical resonators. Indeed we observe frequency shuffling as shown in the numbered pixel layout of Fig.…”
Section: Test Array Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a) and (b). As discussed in our previous paper [26], this is caused by a radial non-uniformity of T c across the wafer in multilayer TiN/Ti/TiN films. Resonators near the turns of the meandering feedline are in general located on the outer ring of the wafer where the T c is lower and kinetic inductance is higher, leading to the larger negative deviation of the resonance frequency.…”
Section: First Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, it is difficult to correctly correspond each resonance to its physical resonator on the wafer because the resonances are shifted from their design values due to wafer nonuniformity. In this step, we use the LED wafer mapping tool that we have previously developed especially for this purpose [26] to establish the correspondence between the measured frequency f mea,i and the number of fingers N IDC,i of the i-th resonator on the wafer.…”
Section: First Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical location of each resonator was mapped at NIST-Boulder using an custom array of optical light-emiting diodes (LEDs) designed for each FPA. 27,28 The three BLAST-TNG detector arrays are shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Mkid Detector Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%