Cryolipolysis versus laser lipolysis on adolescent abdominal adiposity

Mostafa, M. A.; Elshafey, Mohamed Ali

doi:10.1002/lsm.22475

Cited by 24 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One study recommended the individuals to be aged between 13 and 16 years old, to analyze the effect of cryolipolysis in comparison to laser lipolysis in adolescents. 12 Despite the age, there was good adherence to the treatment with satisfactory results, even with a small analyzed sample.…”

Section: Age: When Is the Patient Able To Undergo Cryolipolysis?mentioning

confidence: 95%

“…The photos should serve as an additional analysis resource, and care must be taken when taking the photograph before and after the procedure to ensure standardization of photos in relation to distance, positioning, brightness, etc. 10 , 12 , 14 – 16 , 19 , 20…”

Section: Localized Adiposity Assessing Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to the study of Mostafa and Elshafey, 12 cryolipolysis is considered a safe procedure and may be applied to all skin types without any risk, even with recurrent applications.…”

Section: Skin Characteristics and Skin Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Cryolipolysis: patient selection and special considerations

Meyer¹,

Silva²,

Vasconcellos³

et al. 2018

CCID

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cryolipolysis is considered a safe and effective procedure, with high patient satisfaction rates, especially when compared to other procedures for localized adiposity, such as high-intensity focused ultrasound and shock waves. Although this statement is present in the literature, the importance of the selection of suitable patients for this type of treatment is not well known. The objective of this study was to discuss the criteria to be considered in the selection of patients who are candidates for cryolipolysis and assess their profile regarding their anthropometric data, age, skin characteristics, cutaneous sensitivity, and risk pathologies for this type of treatment. Assessing the amount of localized adiposity requires safe and validated methods that are significant in measuring results. The aim is to achieve success in the process of reducing adiposity guaranteeing patient satisfaction and assurance of results.

show abstract

Section: Age: When Is the Patient Able To Undergo Cryolipolysis?mentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Localized Adiposity Assessing Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cryolipolysis: patient selection and special considerations

Meyer¹,

Silva²,

Vasconcellos³

et al. 2018

CCID

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite the fact that dietary control and physical exercises have been determined to be the main factors in reducing body fat, several adjunctive, non‐invasive modalities have been also proposed for reducing subcutaneous fat deposits and performing aesthetic body sculpting, particularly for individuals requiring less drastic fat reduction, each employing a different mechanism of action to reduce the appearance of adipose tissue. Among these modalities are the high‐intensity focused ultrasound [11], cryolipolysis [12], photobiomodulation [13], and non‐contact radiofrequency [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Randomized, Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation Therapy and Non‐Contact Selective‐Field Radiofrequency on Abdominal Adiposity in Adolescents With Obesity

Elnaggar

2020

Lasers Surg Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: Structured physical activities and dietary control have traditionally been used with the aim of controlling obesity. However, effective auxiliary modalities still needed to reduce local obesity, specifically abdominal obesity. This study examined the adjunct effect of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), and non-contact selective-field radiofrequency (NcRF) on abdominal adiposity in adolescents with obesity. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Fifty-four adolescents with obesity (33 females and 21 males) took part in this study and were distributed randomly into three treatment-based groups. Control group (n = 18, age; 14.61 ± 1.14 years), PBMT group (n = 18, age; 14.22 ± 0.88 years), and NcRF group (n = 18, age; 15.11 ± 0.96 years). A dietary control plan of 1,000-1,200 kcal/day, and a 60-minute aerobic exercise program conducted day-by-day over 4 weeks were provided for all participants. Additionally, the PBMT group received 12 20-minute PBMT on the abdominal area (energy/session~4.08 J/cm 2) thrice/week, and the NcRF group underwent four 30-minute treatments with NcRF on the abdominal area once/week. Waist/hip ratio (W-to-H ratio), intra-abdominal fat thickness (IAFT), and the subcutaneousabdominal fat thickness (SAFT) were observed at the baseline and after 4 weeks. Results: The W-to-H ratio and SAFT reduced significantly in the PBMT group compared with either the control group (P = 0.001 and 0.001, respectively) or the NcRF group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.046, respectively) post-intervention. However, the IAFT and IAFT/SAFT ratio did not differ significantly among the study groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Our analysis shows that PBMT is more efficient than NcRF for the reduction of W-to-H ratio and SAFT in adolescents with obesity. Lasers Surg. Med.

show abstract

“…To identify and describe the satisfaction of the 20 participants with the electrolipolysis treatment, a 5-point Likert satisfaction scale and a sociodemographic questionnaire were used. conceito de uma boa forma vem sofrendo muita influência da mídia que explora o corpo malhado e as mulheres magérrimas, o corpo idealizado vem incentivando cada vez mais as mulheres aos tratamentos estéticos(FERREIRA; CASTRO; MORGADO, 2014, FERREIRA;LEMOS; SILVA, 2010, BARROS et al, 2017.Os tratamentos para a adiposidade abdominal são muitos, entre eles temse: os cirúrgicos, o ultrassom estético, a criolipólise, carboxiterapia, ultracavitação radiofrequência e a eletrolipólise CAMPOS, 2014, KIM;KIM, 2014, SIQUEIRA, 2015ELSHAFEY, 2016, BARROS et al, 2017. coleta de dados foi realizada no turno matutino, durante três vezes por semana, nos meses de outubro a dezembro de 2018.…”

unclassified

A Musculação Terapêutica Como Forma De Tratamento De Osteoartrite De Joelho Em Pacientes Idosos: Uma Revisão Sistemática

Brito¹,

Barros²,

Soares³

et al. 2019

A Função Multiprofissional Da Fisioterapia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Todo o conteúdo deste livro está licenciado sob uma Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons. Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). O conteúdo dos artigos e seus dados em sua forma, correção e confiabilidade são de responsabilidade exclusiva dos autores. Permitido o download da obra e o compartilhamento desde que sejam atribuídos créditos aos autores, mas sem a possibilidade de alterá-la de nenhuma forma ou utilizá-la para fins comerciais.

show abstract

Cryolipolysis versus laser lipolysis on adolescent abdominal adiposity

Cited by 24 publications

References 28 publications

Cryolipolysis: patient selection and special considerations

Cryolipolysis: patient selection and special considerations

A Randomized, Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation Therapy and Non‐Contact Selective‐Field Radiofrequency on Abdominal Adiposity in Adolescents With Obesity

A Musculação Terapêutica Como Forma De Tratamento De Osteoartrite De Joelho Em Pacientes Idosos: Uma Revisão Sistemática

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About