1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(98)00210-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopreservation of in vitro-derived bovine blastocysts microinjected with foreign DNA at the pronuclear stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But in the present study, only 13.4% of 388 fresh zygotes that were transferred after DNA microinjection developed into live young, suggesting that the microinjected DNA adversely affected fetal development. The developmental potential of DNA-injected zygotes has been reported to be considerably reduced in mice , rats (Hirabayashi et al, 1997), rabbits (Chrenek et al, 1998), and cattle (Peura et al, 1995;Ito et al, 1998). We also observed even further reduction in the rate of in vivo development of cryopreserved rabbit zygotes after DNA injection, indicating a synergistic deleterious effect of microinjection and cryopreservation (Tables 2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…But in the present study, only 13.4% of 388 fresh zygotes that were transferred after DNA microinjection developed into live young, suggesting that the microinjected DNA adversely affected fetal development. The developmental potential of DNA-injected zygotes has been reported to be considerably reduced in mice , rats (Hirabayashi et al, 1997), rabbits (Chrenek et al, 1998), and cattle (Peura et al, 1995;Ito et al, 1998). We also observed even further reduction in the rate of in vivo development of cryopreserved rabbit zygotes after DNA injection, indicating a synergistic deleterious effect of microinjection and cryopreservation (Tables 2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In our experiment, the negative effect of transgene introduction occurred in the fi rst cell cycle because the microinjected embryos developed better (61.1%) from cleavage to the blastocyst stage than the control embryos (48.6%). This negative effect on zygote development may result from adverse infl uence of the high forces used for visualization of the pronuclei and opening of the plasma membrane during micromanipulation (Ito et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumptive zygotes were stripped of cumulus cells and then cultured in modified synthetic oviductal fluid (m-SOF) [13] at 39 C in 5% CO2, 5% O2 and 90% N2. Mid to expanded blastocysts, which were constituted from 119.6 ± 31.6 cells (mean ± SD) [14], were harvested on Day 7 (the day of IVF = Day 0).…”
Section: In Vitro Production Of Bovine Blastocystsmentioning
confidence: 99%