2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryopreserved Allografts for Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in Patients Without Autologous Saphenous Veins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are hardly any reports that compare the results of venous and arterial allografts. The vast majority of publications report the results of venous allografts [ 17 21 ], with fewer studies presenting the results of arterial allograft implantations [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are hardly any reports that compare the results of venous and arterial allografts. The vast majority of publications report the results of venous allografts [ 17 21 ], with fewer studies presenting the results of arterial allograft implantations [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dead cause and future analysis should be researched in future publications. Our team has previously focus in this specific endpoint 21,22 . A direct comparison between grafts is considered incorrect because of several factors affecting the outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the occurrence of early occlusion (within 30 days) of the allografts varies in a broad range between 0-17% [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], which could be traced back to effects of multiple factors, such as anatomical location or quality of the allograft. The patency of the implanted grafts strongly depends on the preservation of the inherent thromboresistance of the native arterial wall, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%