2000
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptic genetic variation and paraphyly in ravens

Abstract: Widespread species that are morphologically uniform may be likely to harbour cryptic genetic variation. Common ravens (Corvus corax) have an extensive range covering nearly the entire Northern Hemisphere, but show little discrete phenotypic variation. We obtained tissue samples from throughout much of this range and collected mitochondrial sequence and nuclear microsatellite data. Our study revealed a deep genetic break between ravens from the western United States and ravens from throughout the rest of the wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
138
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
9
138
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Takahata and Slatkin (1984) show that if mtDNA is neutral, only a trickle of gene flow can cause substantial introgression of this DNA between taxa, even if there is substantial hybrid unfitness based on differences in nuclear DNA. It is worth noting that most published claims of paraphyletic species involve phylogenetic analysis based solely on mtDNA (e.g., Melnick et al 1993;Omland et al 2000), and analysis of nuclear loci may show that the paraphyly is not pervasive throughout the genome, particularly if one adheres to the autapomorphic species concept. Our main point, however, is that phenomena such as selective sweeps and introgression can substantially accelerate or decelerate the attainment of monophyly, and that the effects of these forces may be far greater on mtDNA than on a sample of nuclear genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takahata and Slatkin (1984) show that if mtDNA is neutral, only a trickle of gene flow can cause substantial introgression of this DNA between taxa, even if there is substantial hybrid unfitness based on differences in nuclear DNA. It is worth noting that most published claims of paraphyletic species involve phylogenetic analysis based solely on mtDNA (e.g., Melnick et al 1993;Omland et al 2000), and analysis of nuclear loci may show that the paraphyly is not pervasive throughout the genome, particularly if one adheres to the autapomorphic species concept. Our main point, however, is that phenomena such as selective sweeps and introgression can substantially accelerate or decelerate the attainment of monophyly, and that the effects of these forces may be far greater on mtDNA than on a sample of nuclear genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular methods have previously revealed cryptic speciation in birds, but it has typically been associated with geographical variation (e.g. Avise & Nelson 1989;Omland et al 2000). Habitat choice has been implicated in speciation of other organisms, for instance, in insects that specialize on different hosts (Via 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the documented role of anole dewlaps in species recognition and presumably reproductive isolation (e.g., Losos, 1985;Macedonia and Stamps, 1994;Sigmund, 1983), these results may indicate that D. philopunctata is still in its very first stages of speciation. A vast number of studies have documented paraphyly among animal species that are phenotypically and often ecologically distinct (e.g., Brown and Twomey, 2009;Johnson et al, 2005;McKay and Zink, 2010;Omland et al, 2000), including anoles (Thorpe and Stenson, 2003). From the perspective of allele coalescence, the speciation process inherently starts with paraphyly in gene genealogies, and the probability of achieving reciprocal monophyly increases with time since population divergence (Knowles and Carstens, 2007).…”
Section: Genetic and Phenotypic Divergence Between D Punctata And Dmentioning
confidence: 99%