Cryptocurrencies and Tokens Lifetime Analysis from 2009 to 2021

Gatabazi, Paul; Kabera, Gaëtan; Clément, Jules; Pindza, Edson; Melesse, Sileshi Fanta

doi:10.3390/economies10030060

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This study has similarities with the research of Gatabazi et al (2022) which examined the crypto life cycle in the 2013-2017 and 2009-2013 periods, the results show that in the 2013-2017 period crypto has a high risk where many cryptos live and die in that period when compared to the 2009-2013 period. This study has similarities in the form of comparison of the effects of certain events in different periods.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

“…So, this result shows that investors need to be vigilant in choosing the type of crypto that is safe from the threat of death. Types of cryptocurrencies that were popular in the period of 2009-2017 according to Gatabazi et al (2022) namely Litecoin (2011), Peercoin (2012, Ripple (2012), Alphacoin (2013 and Aircoin (2014Aircoin ( -2016. In 2021, new types of crypto are starting to come in, such as Bogged Finance (2021) and Recharge Finance (2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Horizon of Cryptocurrency Before Vs During COVID-19

Waspada¹,

Salim²,

Krisnawati³

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cryptocurrencies are now the most popular investment instruments among millenials. Crypto offers great returns in a short period of time. Prior to COVID-19, Crypto experienced significant price fluctuations accompanied by an increase in the number of high transaction volumes. This situation was disrupted by the presence of the COVID-19 which made the world economy devastated, marked by the decline of stock prices in the world, especially in Indonesia. A paired test was conducted in this study to compare the state of Crypto before and during COVID-19 with the variables of Risk, Transaction Volume, Return, and Sharpe Performance. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the variables of Transaction Volume and Return. However, there was no significant difference in the Risk and Sharpe performance before and during COVID-19. This study shows that despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the enthusiasm of investors who transact crypto assets is not affected and they still get returns in accordance with the investments made. The high risk will be followed by a high standard deviation, so that the Sharpe Performance is small. Cryptocurrencies still have many gaps to research, such as regulation, so that many countries have not legalized Crypto transactions. If there is no regulation for Crypto, it is certain that an increase in cybercrime harms crypto investors and threatens global financial stability. Nevertheles, with or without COVID-19, investment transactions gain and lose based on confidence in the limited market. Therefore, the success of confidence fluctuations in crypto encourages the emergence of alternative coins created by investors to conduct an Initial Coin Offering (ICO).

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Horizon of Cryptocurrency Before Vs During COVID-19

Waspada¹,

Salim²,

Krisnawati³

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is a significant difference between tokens and cryptocurrency. According to Mougayar [45], while the issue and verification of token transactions can be centralized and decentralized, cryptocurrencies can only be decentralized; while the price of tokens can be influenced by a very wide list of factors in addition to supply and demand (issuance of additional tokens, binding to other assets), the price of cryptocurrencies is fully regulated by the market; and while tokens do not necessarily have to be launched on their own blockchain, cryptocurrencies always have their own blockchain [58].…”

Section: Tokens and Cryptocurrencymentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain’s Scope and Purpose in Carbon Markets: A Systematic Literature Review

Vilkov

Tian

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon markets, particularly emission trading schemes (ETS) and carbon offset projects, are significant mechanisms in climate change mitigation. However, there are still a number of unresolved issues regarding their attractiveness and efficient functioning. Blockchain, as the core of “3D’s concept” (including decentralization, decarbonization and digitalization), could be considered as a candidate solution for carbon markets’ improvement. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify the role of blockchain in ETS and carbon offset projects, its key features, implementation challenges and proposed applications, by analyzing and discussing the content of relevant studies, and grouping the results into domains. This study’s findings show that blockchain has great potential to be adopted in carbon markets. However, there is no data on blockchain use cases in energy efficiency, chemical processes and industrial manufacturing, waste disposal, and agriculture. Blockchain-based household and transportation carbon offset projects are linked to renewables through energy trading. Renewables and forestry are the most appropriate domains for blockchain adoption, considering various criteria of quality for carbon offset projects. Blockchain is currently immature in carbon markets because of its own drawbacks and challenges. This study also highlights research gaps and offers research directions to inspire researchers for conducting related investigations.

show abstract

“…There are many factors that affect confidence in cryptocurrencies, such as the currency's circulation rate. According to Paul Gatabazi et al 's analysis of the life cycle of cryptocurrencies and tokens from 2009 to 2021, they found that the risk of collapse of cryptocurrencies under independent blockchain is relatively high [3]. Centralized policies have made transactions easier and faster for many cryptocurrency users, but the absence of such policies can also lead to misjudgments about cryptocurrency transactions and retention periods.…”

Section: Confidence Affects Pricesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of External Factor on Cryptocurrency: Explicit and Implicit Policy

Zhang

2023

AEMPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the view of economists and issuers of cryptocurrencies has changed a lot, from the original price of cryptocurrencies is unpredictable, to the view that cryptocurrencies are affected by several key factors. Confidence is one of the key factors, and it is thought to be controllable. However, many economists and cryptocurrency issuers have acknowledged that the support for confidence in the cryptocurrency market is complex and volatile. The goal of this paper is to propose ways to stabilize confidence in cryptocurrencies based on these studies. Explicit and implicit policies are one of the important factors affecting cryptocurrencies. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the close connection between cryptocurrencies and information, and to analyze how explicit and implicit policies affect cryptocurrency information and markets. The impact of explicit and implicit policies on the price of cryptocurrencies is unpredictable, but it still has regularity in the impact on the price of cryptocurrencies. This article analyzes several notable cryptocurrency explicit and implicit policy events to illustrate the differences and characteristics between the two types of policies. The influence of explicit policy is not positively correlated with its propaganda intensity in the short term but will be maintained and stable in the long term. Stealth policies tend to show dramatic changes in a short period of time and are highly correlated with popularity. While hidden policies can cause sudden fluctuations, issuers of cryptocurrencies should pay more attention to the effects of explicit policies because they are more durable.

show abstract

Cryptocurrencies and Tokens Lifetime Analysis from 2009 to 2021

Cited by 9 publications

References 20 publications

Horizon of Cryptocurrency Before Vs During COVID-19

Horizon of Cryptocurrency Before Vs During COVID-19

Blockchain’s Scope and Purpose in Carbon Markets: A Systematic Literature Review

The Impact of External Factor on Cryptocurrency: Explicit and Implicit Policy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About