1999
DOI: 10.1007/s003300050676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptorchidism: strategies in detection

Abstract: Imaging evaluation of the patient with a non-palpable testis has evolved over recent decades. The rational explanation of imaging in these patients requires a clear understanding of the various causes of a non-palpable testis, and an appreciation of the utility and limitations of the available imaging modalities. This review describes the classification of non-palpable testis and discusses the role of modern imaging in evaluation. In particular, the relative accuracies of ultrasound, CT and MRI is reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Torsion of undescended testes were noted in one case also noted by Nguyen and Hricak. [25] Testicular Cysts Hamm et al [26] had an incidence of 4% of testicular cysts, while in our study it is 3%. In all cases they were seen as well circumscribed, anechoic lesions with thin smooth walls and posterior acoustic enhancement.…”
Section: Malpositioned Testescontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Torsion of undescended testes were noted in one case also noted by Nguyen and Hricak. [25] Testicular Cysts Hamm et al [26] had an incidence of 4% of testicular cysts, while in our study it is 3%. In all cases they were seen as well circumscribed, anechoic lesions with thin smooth walls and posterior acoustic enhancement.…”
Section: Malpositioned Testescontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Undescended testes carry a significantly higher risk for development of malignancy. It is reported that 10% of all testicular malignancies occur in undescended testes or in testes treated for cryptorchidism [9,10]. 976 Intra-abdominal testes carries a four times greater risk for development of malignancy than an inguinal testis [11].…”
Section: Undescended Testesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a sensitivity of 70-90% in the diagnosis of inguinal testes, ultrasonography is not useful in intra-abdominal cases (14). Although presenting a better quality, both computed tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be considered as gold standard diagnostic tools (15). More recently, the magnetic angioresonance was introduced with sensibility of 96% and specificity of 100%, but it is still a new method, with high costs, also requiring general anesthesia in children (16).…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%