2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. (oo)cysts as target-organisms in sanitation and environmental monitoring: A review in microscopy-based viability assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One group was exposed to non-treated water (negative control). Giardia cyst viability was evaluated by non-fluorogenic dye exclusion method with trypan blue [ 37 , 38 , 39 ]. The percentage of non-viable cysts was calculated using the formula: (1 − (total number of viable cysts per ml of aliquot /total number of cysts per ml of aliquot)) × 100.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One group was exposed to non-treated water (negative control). Giardia cyst viability was evaluated by non-fluorogenic dye exclusion method with trypan blue [ 37 , 38 , 39 ]. The percentage of non-viable cysts was calculated using the formula: (1 − (total number of viable cysts per ml of aliquot /total number of cysts per ml of aliquot)) × 100.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, sunlight-based technologies are particularly promising for resource-poor environments, connecting SDGs 6 and 7, reducing costs with illumination settings, and fostering innovation for water and wastewater treatment. Additionally, point-of-use disinfection acts directly on reducing the waterborne disease burden (Silva et al 2021), providing impact on health and well-being (SDG 3).…”
Section: Challenges and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that IFA refers to the current protocol established by USEPA methods 1623.1 and 1693 for analysis of water and disinfected wastewater (2012,2014), thus it is assumed to be the first resource WASH practitioners would rely on for periodically monitoring quality considering protozoan parasites. In fact, several studies on environmental samples that do not have a standardised detection method include IFA (Olson et al 1999;Greinert et al 2004;Graczyk et al 2008;Grit et al 2012;Giglio & Sabogal-Paz 2018;Sammarro-Silva & Sabogal-Paz 2020, 2021a, 2021bOgura & Sabogal-Paz 2021. The motive for choosing this protocol is assumed to be its high sensitivity, as older references that consider complex matrices were also immunofluorescencebased, as in Olson et al (1999), which used IFA to quantify the survival of cysts seeded into soil and cattle waste.…”
Section: Immunofluorescence Assay and Dapi Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 2011 to 2016, 37% of worldwide waterborne protozoa outbreaks were caused by this zoonotic protozoan (Efstratiou et al 2017). The chlorine-resistance characteristic combined with cysts' ability to permeate filtration units because they are small (6-15 μm) can explain the occurrence of giardiasis epidemics after consumption of treated drinking water in several countries (Smith 1998;Omarova et al 2018). This illustrates the importance of considering this pathogen when making decisions regarding water and sanitation, as well as including it in regular monitoring of water systems, either conventional or point-of-use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%