Mineral Fibres: Crystal Chemistry, Chemical-Physical Properties, Biological Interaction and Toxicity 2017
DOI: 10.1180/emu-notes.18.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal habit of mineral fibres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the physical features, the diameter seems to be the main factor controlling the ability of fibers to reach the lower respiratory tract, while macrophage phagocytosis is more dependent on fiber length [7,74]. According to [4], an elongated particle is defined as "inhalable" for humans when its diameter is <3.5 µm, while [19] considers as inhalable the fibers with a diameter-length ratio ≥1:3, a length >5 µm, and a diameter <3 µm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the physical features, the diameter seems to be the main factor controlling the ability of fibers to reach the lower respiratory tract, while macrophage phagocytosis is more dependent on fiber length [7,74]. According to [4], an elongated particle is defined as "inhalable" for humans when its diameter is <3.5 µm, while [19] considers as inhalable the fibers with a diameter-length ratio ≥1:3, a length >5 µm, and a diameter <3 µm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important factors for defining the hazardousness of mineral fibers is their size or their tendency to split into smaller fibrils that are easily inhalable [3][4][5][6][7]. The biopersistence of fibers, defined as their ability to persist in the human body to chemical, physical, and other physiological clearance mechanisms, is another important factor for inducing toxicity and carcinogenicity [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to problems of compatibility and reproducibility between different laboratories. Another concern is the classification of non-asbestos classified fibers [4] whose potential hazard is not fully investigated, such as prismatic and acicular habits or cleavage fragments of amphiboles and other elongated mineral particles (EMP) that are even more common [5]. Research and debate are in progress about the composition and morphology of the various types of asbestos and the related fibrous minerals not classified as asbestos, such as erionite and fibrous antigorite [6,7], which are similar in morphology to the polymorph chrysotile of asbestos and not always distinguishable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of toxicity and carcinogenicity of asbestos minerals has long been discussed since the 20 century, because it represents a clear consequence for human health. The term asbestos represents a series of six natural asbestiform silicate minerals, which include serpentine (chrysotile), as well as amphibole minerals (tremolite, actinolite, anthophyllite, amosite, and crocidolite that represent a variety of commercial term of fibrous riebeckite) that are defined by law in Europe and in several countries worldwide [1][2][3][4] and also by Italian law (D.Lgs. 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%