2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0019067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal imperfections in ice Ih

Abstract: In this paper, we present an overview of crystal imperfections in ice Ih. Due to its molecular nature, the fundamental asymmetry of the hydrogen bond, and proton disorder, crystal defects in this condensed form of water reveal a complexity not usually seen in atomic crystalline solids. The discussion is organized in terms of the spatial extent of the defects. We start with zero-dimensional imperfections such as the molecular vacancy and interstitial, Bjerrum, and ionic defects, as well as possible defect compl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ice adhesion on a rough surface, , there are four types of interfacial forces (as shown in Figure ) on the ice-solid interface: van der Waals force, chemical bonding, electrostatic force, and mechanical locking . van der Waals force and chemical bonding are generally not considered the major forces in the case of ice adhesion mechanism. , Taking into account the charged carriers generated by the crystal defects , in the freezing process of the droplet and the Cassie–Wenzel state (see the Supporting Information (SI) Section 1) of the droplet before ice formation on the surface, electrostatic force and mechanical locking force are considered the two major forces in the case of ice adhesion mechanisms.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ice adhesion on a rough surface, , there are four types of interfacial forces (as shown in Figure ) on the ice-solid interface: van der Waals force, chemical bonding, electrostatic force, and mechanical locking . van der Waals force and chemical bonding are generally not considered the major forces in the case of ice adhesion mechanism. , Taking into account the charged carriers generated by the crystal defects , in the freezing process of the droplet and the Cassie–Wenzel state (see the Supporting Information (SI) Section 1) of the droplet before ice formation on the surface, electrostatic force and mechanical locking force are considered the two major forces in the case of ice adhesion mechanisms.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both prismatic faces are perpendicular to the basal face, which is the one that develops stacking faults. Hexagonal ice has also been found to nucleate on the (001) face of kaolinite and some simple non-hydrogen-bonding model surfaces. , The commonality between these ice nucleating surfaces and the (001) and (010) faces of PD is that they all bind ice through one of its prismatic planes, which are perpendicular to those of the stacking faults and, therefore, would have to pay a free energy penalty , for their formation. We conclude that the cost of these defects is higher than the gain from stacking disorder, which is 7.5 RT for an ice nucleus with ∼500 water molecules .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of microscopic structures is impervious to CNT-based approaches which, in fact, usually neglect structural effects completely in rate calculations. However, stacking faults and fivefold defect structures [148], detected during the quiescent nucleation of supercooled water [149][150][151], have been found to emerge as precursors to nucleation, even before critical nuclei appear [87]. Furthermore, there is long-standing evidence that morphological and structural characteristics of emergent crystalline structures have a non-trivial impact on the sheared nucleation process [152].…”
Section: Shear-induced Changes In Microscopic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%