1-Ethynyl-2,3,4,5-tetramethylruthenocene was prepared by the reaction of 1-formyl-2,3,4,5-tetramethylruthenocene with trimethylsilyldiazomethyllithium and also by the reaction of
1-(2‘,2‘-dichlorovinyl)-2,3,4,5-tetramethylruthenocene, which was obtained from the reaction
of 1-formyl-2,3,4,5-tetramethylruthenocene with lithium dichloromethyldiethylphosphonate
and tert-butyllithium in good yield. 1-Ethynyl-2,3,4,5-tetramethylruthenocene reacted with
RuClP
2L (P
2 = 2 PPh3 or dppe; L = η-C5H5, η-C5Me5, or η5-C9H7) in the presence of NH4PF6
or AgBF4, followed by the column chromatography on deactivated Al2O3, to give Ru(C⋮CRc‘)P
2L in moderate or good yield. Ru(C⋮CRc)P
2(η5-C9H7) and Ru(C⋮CRc*)P
2(η5-C9H7)
were similarly prepared (Rc, Rc‘, and Rc* are ruthenocenyl, 2,3,4,5-tetramethylruthenocenyl,
and 1‘,2‘,3‘,4‘,5‘-pentamethylruthenocenyl, respectively). The structures of Ru(C⋮CRc‘)(dppe)(PPh3)2(η-C5H5), Ru(C⋮CRc)(dppe)(η5-C9H7), and Ru(C⋮CRc‘)(dppe)(η5-C9H7) were determined by X-ray analysis. Cyclic voltammetry of the acetylide complexes showed two well-separated quasi-reversible waves. Chemical oxidation of ruthenium(II) 2,3,4,5-tetramethylruthenocenylacetylide complexes gave products whose stability was dependent on the ligand
on the Ru(II) moiety. The 13C NMR spectrum of the oxidized species isolated as stable crystals
confirmed the structural rearrangement of the bridging acetylide ligand to a μ-η6:η1-[(cyclopentadienylidene)ethylidene] ligand. The structure of [(η-C5H5)Ru(μ-η6:η1-C5Me4CC)Ru(dppe)(η5-C5Me5)](BF4)2 was determined by X-ray analysis.