1985
DOI: 10.1021/ic00199a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure of Cs+[(XeOF4)3F]- and vibrational study of the oxygen-18-enriched [XeOF5]- and [(XeOF4)3F]- anions

Abstract: The cesium salts of the anions [XeOF5]' and [(XeOF4)3F]" have been prepared and characterized. The Raman spectra of Xe16OF5" and Xe18OFs" are consistent with a stereochemically active lone pair in the xenon valence shell that results in a distorted octahedral arrangement of five fluorines and one oxygen around xenon to give Cs symmetry. The X-ray structure of Cs+[(XeOF4)3F]" has been obtained. Crystals are cubic, space group Pa3 with a = 13.933 (7) Á and Z = 8. The structure was solved by means of Patterson an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“… [ N ( CH 3 ) 4 ] [ XeOF 3 ] + SO 2 78 normal° C neat XeF 2 + SO 3 + [ N ( CH 3 false) 4 ] [ F ] An attempt to dissolve [Cs][XeOF 3 ] in XeOF 4 at ca. 20 °C resulted in oxygen/fluorine metathesis to give XeF 4 , XeO 2 F 2 , and [Cs][F(XeOF 4 ) m ] according to eq . [ Cs ] [ XeOF 3 ] + ( m + 1 ) XeOF 4 20 normal° C neat XeF 4 + XeO 2 F 2 + [ Cs ] [ F ( XeOF 4…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… [ N ( CH 3 ) 4 ] [ XeOF 3 ] + SO 2 78 normal° C neat XeF 2 + SO 3 + [ N ( CH 3 false) 4 ] [ F ] An attempt to dissolve [Cs][XeOF 3 ] in XeOF 4 at ca. 20 °C resulted in oxygen/fluorine metathesis to give XeF 4 , XeO 2 F 2 , and [Cs][F(XeOF 4 ) m ] according to eq . [ Cs ] [ XeOF 3 ] + ( m + 1 ) XeOF 4 20 normal° C neat XeF 4 + XeO 2 F 2 + [ Cs ] [ F ( XeOF 4…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weak bands between 223 and 276 cm −1 in the Cs + salt are absent in the N(CH 3 ) 4 + salt. These bands are in the appropriate region and are of appropriate intensity for stretching modes associated with fluorine bridges, suggesting an oligomeric or chain structure for [Cs][XeOF 3 ]. Such long contacts most likely result in coupling between XeOF 3 − units which not only would account for the splittings of the vibrational bands but also may result in symmetry reduction and observation of the ν as (XeF 2a ) stretching mode at 498.9, 509.7, and 512.8 cm −1 which was not observed in the N(CH 3 ) 4 + salt.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The general preference for fluorine-bridge formation over oxygenbridge formation is also found in the polynuclear Xe(VI) salt, [Cs][(XeOF 4 ) 3 F]. 24,25 The only confirmed hydroxy derivatives of xenon are the perxenate anions, H 3 XeO 6 − , H 2 XeO 6 2− , and HXeO 6 3− that were observed by conventional and stopped-flow spectrophotometry in the pH ranges −0.2−2, 6−8, and 12−13, respectively. 26 The Raman spectra of aqueous alkaline perxenate solutions show the Xe(VIII) species present are octahedrally coordinated but fail to provide further structural details.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…All of the aforementioned polynuclear xenon cations and the Xe 3 OF 3 + cation contain fluorine-bridged xenon atoms (the Xe 3 OF 3 + cation also contains a Xe–O–Xe bridge) . The general preference for fluorine-bridge formation over oxygen-bridge formation is also found in the polynuclear Xe(VI) salt, [Cs][(XeOF 4 ) 3 F]. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, compounds featuring m 2 -F bridges between two nonmetal atoms are even more uncommon; examples are known for H, 26 Kr, 27,28 Xe, 29 Br, 4,30 and I, 31 as well as for several metalloid atoms: B, 32 As, 33 Sb, 34 and Si. 35 To the best of our knowledge, the m 3 -F type among nonmetals was fully established only for Xe 36 and I. 20,21 Here, we report the results of our investigations on the non-common fluorine bridging in rubidium and cesium decafluoridotribromates(III): RbBr 3 F 10 (compound 1) and CsBr 3 F 10 (compound 2), respectively, as well as in rubidium heptafluoridodibromate(III), RbBr 2 F 7 (compound 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%