1991
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.2.502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure of interleukin 8: symbiosis of NMR and crystallography.

Abstract: The crystal structure of a host defense system chemotactic factor, interleukin 8, has been solved by molecular replacement using as a model the solution structure derived from nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. The structure was refined with 2 A x-ray data to an R factor of 0.187 (0.217 at 1.6 A). A comparison indicates some potential differences between the structure in solution and in the crystalline state. Our analysis also predicts that residues 4 through 9 on the amino terminus and the (-bend, which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
224
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
224
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their differences could be due to a combination of inaccuracies of each structure and genuine differences between the structures of proteins in crystals and in solution (Baldwin et al, 1991;Shaanan et al, 1992 (Powers et al, 1993) yield similar results. We may conclude that while some of ,the differences between the structures of the three cytokines might be due to the differences of crystal packing and to inaccuracies in structure determination, such influences are not major because they are on the same order as the differences found in the same structure studied by different means and in different environments.…”
Section: Superposition Of Atomic Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Their differences could be due to a combination of inaccuracies of each structure and genuine differences between the structures of proteins in crystals and in solution (Baldwin et al, 1991;Shaanan et al, 1992 (Powers et al, 1993) yield similar results. We may conclude that while some of ,the differences between the structures of the three cytokines might be due to the differences of crystal packing and to inaccuracies in structure determination, such influences are not major because they are on the same order as the differences found in the same structure studied by different means and in different environments.…”
Section: Superposition Of Atomic Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The nature of the charge (Glu or Arg) was chosen to oppose the local charged residues seen in the dimer structure. For example, E24 of the first subunit forms an ion pair with R26' of the second subunit (Baldwin et al, 1991). Therefore, E24R was selected to disrupt the ion pair and provide repulsive interactions with R26' and I28'R.…”
Section: Design Of Weakly Dimerizing Il-8 Variants Through Side-chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IL-8 exists as a non-covalent homodimer of 8 kDa subunits both at high concentrations in solution and crystal structures (Clore et al, 1989(Clore et al, , 1990Baldwin et al, 1991;, raising the question of whether ligand dimerization is involved in signal transduction. The primary functional determinant for binding of IL-8 to its neutrophil receptors is a short peptide motif corresponding to the peptide sequence GluLeu-Arg ("ELR') near the amino terminus of IL-8 (Clark- Lewis et al, 1991Lewis et al, , 1993HCbert et al, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its structure, determined by solution NMR spectroscopy (8) and x-ray crystallography (9), is characterized by having a flexible N-terminal segment containing a conserved Glu-Leu-Arg (ELR) motif just before the characteristic CXC arrangement of cysteine residues (X represents another type of amino acid) that participate in the two disulfide bonds that stabilize the tertiary fold of the three b-strands and single a-helical segment. Most CXC chemokines have between 70 and 130 residues with substantial variation of sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%