1994
DOI: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90326-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystal structure of tandem type III fiibronectin domains from drosophila neuroglian at 2.0 å

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1B). Of the structurally characterized Ig-like folds, only a few have a similar disulfide bond, including CD2 domain 2 (25) and the first fibronectin III repeat of neuroglian (26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B). Of the structurally characterized Ig-like folds, only a few have a similar disulfide bond, including CD2 domain 2 (25) and the first fibronectin III repeat of neuroglian (26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRET remaining at 2 M Gdn⅐HCl would then occur mainly between donors and acceptors in close proximity along the strands. High-resolution structures of FnIII modules have shown that different modules are structurally homologous and measure 3.2 nm from N to C terminus (22)(23)(24)(25). Because FRET is limited to donors and acceptors located within 10 nm of each other (26), only donors within modules FnIII 5-9 and FnIII [13][14][15] are sufficiently close to acceptors located within FnIII 7 and FnIII 15 to permit energy transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On both measures, the models were comparable to the templates. For ProfileQD, the evaluation scores for the growth hormone receptors (de Vos et al, 1992) and Drosophila neuroglian (Huber et al, 1994) ranged from 69 to 81% (observed score/expected score) and for the models, values ranged from 63 to 79%. Similarly, when using ProsaII, the models scored slightly less well than the crystal structures overall, but were better than the experimental structures over considerable regions (Smith, 889 1996).…”
Section: Model Structural Evaluation and Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models using both positions for the second disulfide bridge were constructed and evaluated to test whether this novel disulfide arrangement was more probable in LIFR. (Leahy et al., 1992); Drosophila neuroglian, lCFB (Huber et al, 1994); tissue factor, 2HFT (Muller et at., 1994)], and these were examined as part of the alignment process and for structural similarity. It was found that, when the coordinates of these FnIlI domains were superimposed, as shown in Figure 2, they had RMSD values ranging from 0.6 A to I .9 A, with an average of 1.2 A over the core B, C, E, and F strands (Smith, 1996).…”
Section: E L 8 D --~G T a H T I T D A Y A --G K E Y I 1~6 A A ~O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%