Charge anisotropy or the presence of charge patches at protein surfaces
has long been thought to shift the coacervation curves of proteins and has been used to explain the
ability of some proteins to coacervate on the “wrong side”
of their isoelectric point. This work makes use of a panel of engineered
superfolder green fluorescent protein mutants with varying surface
charge distributions but equivalent net charge and a suite of strong
and weak polyelectrolytes to explore this concept. A patchiness parameter,
which assessed the charge correlation between points on the surface
of the protein, was used to quantify the patchiness of the designed
mutants. Complexation between the polyelectrolytes and proteins showed
that the mutant with the largest patchiness parameter was the most
likely to form complexes, while the smallest was the least likely
to do so. The patchiness parameter was found to correlate well with
the phase behavior of the protein–polymer mixtures, where both
macrophase separation and the formation of soluble aggregates were
promoted by increasing the patchiness depending on the polyelectrolyte
with which the protein was mixed. Increasing total charge and increasing
strength of the polyelectrolyte promote interactions for oppositely
charged polyelectrolytes, while charge regulation is also key to interactions
for similarly charged polyelectrolytes, which must interact selectively
with oppositely charged patches.