2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystalline and amorphous deformation of process-controlled cellulose-II fibres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
63
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So a smaller diameter could yield a higher modulus. Our values for the predicted moduli of the fibrils do exceed those obtained for the same batch of micron-sized fibres (~26 GPa) [48] which suggests that some reduction in the lateral size of the fibres results in an increase in the modulus. This increase in modulus could occur due to the inherent lateral crystal dimension becoming more significant at smaller fibre diameters.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiescontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…So a smaller diameter could yield a higher modulus. Our values for the predicted moduli of the fibrils do exceed those obtained for the same batch of micron-sized fibres (~26 GPa) [48] which suggests that some reduction in the lateral size of the fibres results in an increase in the modulus. This increase in modulus could occur due to the inherent lateral crystal dimension becoming more significant at smaller fibre diameters.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiescontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…This permanent change in preferred orientation caused an improved modulus of elasticity (34.4 ± 4.9 GPa vs. 24.5 ± 3.5 GPa), reduced elongation at break (4.8 ± 1.2% vs. 10.1 ± 1.2%), but no significant change in tensile strength (605 ± 48 MPa vs. 612 ± 52 MPa). It is thus demonstrated that a change in the degree of preferred orientation, in the present case induced by 8% stretching corresponding to a draw ration of only 1.08, has significant effects on the modulus of elasticity and the elongation at break, but not the tensile strength, which is significantly different from the effect of drawing during the spinning process (Kong and Eichhorn 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…These structural differences may well serve to explain the observed different behaviour in tensile tests. On a set of lyocell fibres spun with different draw ratio a strong dependence of mechanical properties on the degree of preferred orientation was shown (Kong and Eichhorn 2005): in general, the tensile strength and the modulus of elasticity of a fibre increase with increasing degree of preferred orientation, whereas the elongation at break decreases in turn. The lyocell fibre tow and staple fibre studied here obey this relationship regarding their modulus of elasticity and elongation at break.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eichhorn et al 2003Eichhorn et al , 2005Kong and Eichhorn 2005a) and by Northolt and co-workers (e.g. Northolt and Baltussen 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Typical lyocell staple fibres show a tensile strength of 750 MPa, an elastic modulus of 22 GPa, and an elongation at break of 8% . By varying chemical parameters and process parameters, the cross-sectional shape and mechanical properties of regenerated cellulose fibres may be tuned within a wide range (Lenz et al 1994;Kong and Eichhorn 2005a), and a tensile strength of up to 1300 MPa and an elastic modulus of up to 45 GPa may be achieved (Northolt et al 2001). In absolute terms, these values are not truly competitive with glass fibre, but considering the low density of 1.5 g cm )3 of cellulose compared to 2.5 g cm )3 for glass, comparability is given on a weight basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%