2014
DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60234f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallization under nanoscale confinement

Abstract: Classical crystal growth models posit that crystallization outcomes are determined by nuclei that resemble mature crystal phases, but at a critical size where the volume free energy of nuclei begins to offset the unfavorable surface free energy arising from the interface with the growth medium. Crystallization under nanoscale confinement offers an opportunity to examine nucleation and phase transformations at length scales corresponding to the critical size, at which kinetics and thermodynamics of nucleation a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
287
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(299 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
12
287
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, it is well-recognized that many features of crystal growth are affected by confinement [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and solution composition [2,[8][9][10][11][12]. Confinement can enable control over size, polymorphism and orientation, single crystal/polycrystalline structure, and morphology [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it is well-recognized that many features of crystal growth are affected by confinement [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and solution composition [2,[8][9][10][11][12]. Confinement can enable control over size, polymorphism and orientation, single crystal/polycrystalline structure, and morphology [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17] Recently, nanoscale confinement methods such as crystallization in controlled pore glass and nanodrops have shown great utility in obtaining metastable polymorphs of numerous pharmaceutical compounds. [18][19][20][21][22] These results suggest that there is a fundamental connection between confined environments and metastable crystallization. However, these methods do not yield significant amounts of the metastable polymorph for further testing and processing.…”
Section: Solid Phases and Polymorphismmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…As an alternative to additive-directed crystallization, it is also becoming increasingly evident that the micro-environments in which crystals form can themselves define crystallization pathways and products. [15][16][17][18][19] Not only is this of particular importance to processes that naturally occur in confinement such as weathering, biomineralization and the manufacture of nanomaterials, but confinement can potentially provide a stand-alone means of controlling crystallization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have focused on organic compounds, where these have shown effects such as the stabilization of amorphous and metastable phases, and preferred orientation. 18,20,21 Looking then at biologically-relevant solids such as calcium carbonate and calcium sulfate, confined volumes can provide environments that can control the formation of single crystals with complex morphologies. 7,[22][23][24] Using systems including a crossedcylinders apparatus, 19,25,26 arrays of picolitre droplets, 27 vesicles that offer confinement in the general range 50 nm -50 m, [28][29][30] and the pores of track-etched membranes, [31][32][33] it has also been demonstrated that the lifetimes of amorphous precursor phases and metastable crystalline polymorphs of calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate, calcium sulfate and calcium oxalate can be significantly extended, even in micron-scale environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%