2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2013.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crystallographic Analysis of Isothermally Transformed Bainite in 0.2C–2.0Mn–1.5Si–0.6Cr Steel Using EBSD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scatter of nanohardness distribution in LB is larger than other ferritic phases (Figure 3b). This may be due to the hierarchy structure of LB [25] and possibly a locally inhomogeneous dislocation density. However, the scatter of nanohardness distribution in LB is smaller than that in lath martensite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scatter of nanohardness distribution in LB is larger than other ferritic phases (Figure 3b). This may be due to the hierarchy structure of LB [25] and possibly a locally inhomogeneous dislocation density. However, the scatter of nanohardness distribution in LB is smaller than that in lath martensite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gives less hard impingement and as a result these variants are preferred for growth. The findings of Suikkanen et al 47 support this assertion. Thus, where there is variant selection due to application of external stress and/or strain there is a tendency for more variants to form from one Bain group.…”
Section: Effect Of Variant Selection On Microstructure and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Overall texture intensity of AIR-steel was higher rather than ACC-steel due to the formation of {110}//RD grains accompanied by banded microstructure. Suikkanen et al [40] characterized a {110} plane of the carbide-free bainitic ferrite similar to the martensitic transformation originated from close-packed {111} austenite plane because of the accommodation of transformation strains, enhancing the bainitic transformation. The formation of (211)[011] component could be explained by Shackleton and Kelly works which reported that the habit plane of cementite in lower bainitic ferrite is corresponding to { 001 } // { 211 } [41].…”
Section: Crystallographic Texturementioning
confidence: 99%