2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CS-4,6 is differentially upregulated in glial scar and is a potent inhibitor of neurite extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
148
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
9
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several lines of evidence support the importance of differentially sulfated CS-GAGs in controlling axon regeneration following CNS injury, with 4S being inhibitory while 6S is either inhibitory or permissive (Gilbert et al, 2005;Lin et al, 2011;Properzi et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2008). Using antibodies specific for sulfation patterns on GAG chains, we detected an increased level of 4S, but not 6S, in a tight band around the injury core, overlapping with the neurocan staining.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several lines of evidence support the importance of differentially sulfated CS-GAGs in controlling axon regeneration following CNS injury, with 4S being inhibitory while 6S is either inhibitory or permissive (Gilbert et al, 2005;Lin et al, 2011;Properzi et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2008). Using antibodies specific for sulfation patterns on GAG chains, we detected an increased level of 4S, but not 6S, in a tight band around the injury core, overlapping with the neurocan staining.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…It has been proposed that the sulfation pattern on the GAGs confers specific biological activity on axonal growth, either inhibiting (Gilbert et al, 2005;Properzi et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2008) or promoting (Gama et al, 2006;Lin et al, 2011) growth. The majority of CS-GAG sulfation in the mammalian central nervous system is found as disaccharides with a sulfate group on the 4 or 6 position of GalNAc (Ishii and Maeda, 2008;Kitagawa et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An optimized decellularization process for nucleus pulposus needs to balance the removal of cells with the maintenance of sGAGs. The sGAGs are essential in maintaining the osmotic pressure of the nucleus pulposus [8], and they have the potential to play a role in driving cell phenotype [45][46][47]50,58] and preventing innervation [59][60][61][62]. The gentle decellularization protocol used in our laboratory for nerve [39,43,63] and lung tissue [38] was adapted for use in the nucleus pulposus by shortening the duration of wash cycles substantially.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our confocal results indicate preservation of CSPGs after decellularization. CSPGs are known to be potent neurite inhibitors [11,12,60,64]. By maintaining CSPG presence in the matrix, this has the potential to prevent nerve growth into the nucleus pulposus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After lesions, CSPGs are upregulated several-fold, peaking at between 10 to 14 days post-lesion [2] . Together with activated glial cells, the CSPGs form a dense layer of glial scar inhibitory to axon growth, and much of this inhibition is due to the activity of the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains [3] . in addition, CSPGs are major components of the perineuronal nets (PNNs), which are dense ECM structures that form around many neuronal cell bodies and dendrites late in development [4,5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%