learning how macrophages exert distinct effects on tumor pathophysiology based on their response to the specific microenvironment of tumors that they rove. This review also helped popularize the nomenclature of tumor-associated macrophages, or TAM, now a widely understood moniker used broadly in the field.
Key Messages from the ReviewTAM infiltration was already shown to correlate with poor prognosis of cancer patients. The central message of this seminal review from Drs. Lewis and Pollard was that different TAM populations coexist in tumor, in distinct microenvironments, including areas of invasion, where TAMs promote cancer cell motility, stromal and perivascular areas, where TAMs promote metastasis, and avascular and perinecrotic areas, where hypoxic TAM stimulate angiogenesis. In terms of phenotype and diversity, this review provided a highlight complementing the M1/M2 polarization model proposed by Mantovani and colleagues (2), where exposure to IL4 and IL10 in tumors induced type II polarized TAM (alternatively activated) or M2 macrophage development. Here, distinct TAM populations were described according to their localization in different zones of the tumors and associated functions. An important aspect of the work of Pollard's team was the use of the MMTV-PyMT-induced spontaneous mammary tumor model, allowing longitudinal analyses of TAM at different stages of tumor development, a model that is now used very widely in cancer biology, physiology, and pharmacology studies. Distinct contributions of TAM to malignant development discussed in the review are noted below.
InvasionTAMs present in areas of basement membrane breakdown and invasion during early-stage lesion development produce upregulated levels of proteolytic enzymes (cathepsin B and matrix metalloproteinases) and promote directional movement and invasion of the tumor cells.