2015
DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1107761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT fluoroscopy-guided closed-tip catheter placement before regional hyperthermia treatment of soft tissue sarcomas: 5-Year experience in 35 consecutive patients

Abstract: CT fluoroscopy-guided closed-tip catheter placement into high-risk soft tissue sarcomas was characterised by high technical success and relatively low complication rate. While major complications were rarely observed, catheter-kinking preventing successful thermometry represented the most frequent technical failure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The whole catheter implementation was performed under periodical single-shot CT fluoroscopic acquisitions only. Further details about the CT fluoroscopy in RHT are described by Strobl et al [10]. The procedure of the catheter invasive placement was carried out by a board-certified radiologist with an experience of over 5 years in CT-guided interventions.…”
Section: Implementation Of Tumor Cathetersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The whole catheter implementation was performed under periodical single-shot CT fluoroscopic acquisitions only. Further details about the CT fluoroscopy in RHT are described by Strobl et al [10]. The procedure of the catheter invasive placement was carried out by a board-certified radiologist with an experience of over 5 years in CT-guided interventions.…”
Section: Implementation Of Tumor Cathetersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimal-invasive thermometry in the pelvic tumors was as effective as invasive thermal monitoring [9]. The use of invasive catheters in the tumor is relatively time-consuming and can be associated with potential risks such as hemorrhages, infections, acute side effects, and a low acceptance by patients and physicians [10]. Nonetheless, many clinical studies reported that interstitially measured temperatures correlate well with clinical endpoints [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treating temperature of target tissue should be 41–46 °C to destroy the cancer cells while avoiding the harm on normal cells [3]. To prevent treating temperature to a higher value, a thermometry probe contacting with target tissue is always needed [4, 5]. However, this method is harmful when tumor is inside the body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%