2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2017.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CT- versus MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparative study of CT and MRI in imaging diagnosis of KOA, the detection rate of CT for bone hyperplasia and loose bodies in the diseased position was higher than that of MRI. However, MRI had higher detection of cartilage destruction, meniscus degeneration, synovial changes, and joint cavity effusion in osteoarthritis than CT scan [22]. Both CT and MRI can provide a certain degree of guidance value for the clinical diagnosis of KOA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In comparative study of CT and MRI in imaging diagnosis of KOA, the detection rate of CT for bone hyperplasia and loose bodies in the diseased position was higher than that of MRI. However, MRI had higher detection of cartilage destruction, meniscus degeneration, synovial changes, and joint cavity effusion in osteoarthritis than CT scan [22]. Both CT and MRI can provide a certain degree of guidance value for the clinical diagnosis of KOA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…CT is the choice of modality in the presence of metallic implants. MRI-based patient-specific cutting guides are reported to produce greater accuracy in terms of coronal alignment compared to CT 37 . However, controversy exists in regard to femoral and tibial component alignment with the utilization of CT or MRI 38,39 .…”
Section: Alignment and Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there were no noteworthy contrasts in the coronal/sagittal arrangement of the femoral/tibia segment exceptions, the precise coronal blunders in the general appendage arrangement, the rakish mistakes in the femoral/tibia segments in the coronal plane, or the frequency of increases in the embedded sizes of the femoral/tibia segments were monitored. [28] This meta-investigation proposed that MRI-based PSI frameworks are related to a lower occurrence of anomalies of coronas with general appendage arrangements, smaller rakish coronal phenomena with general appendage arrangements, and shorter activity times than CT-based PSI. Both CT-and MRI-based PSI have advantages and disadvantages and are powerless to differentiate between many issues; therefore, PSI requires constant enhancement to accomplish better clinical results than have previously been prescribed for routine use.…”
Section: S12mentioning
confidence: 99%