CTSim: Changing teaching practice in radiography with simulation

Stowe, John; O’Halloran, Cath; Photopoulos, Gregory; Lia, Ayuningrum; Quinn, Molly S.; Tschan, Franziska; Verwoolde, R.; Buissink, C.

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2020.10.017

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Each of these studies reported statistical significance in the improvements over the control group, highlighting the advantages of simulation over conventional teaching methods. The favourable results from Alinier, Harwood 9 and Stowe, O'Halloran 18 reflect well on their respective interventions; however, their control groups received no intervention. This fails to address the question regarding the effectiveness of simulation compared with conventional teaching methods.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

“…The use of performance‐based outcome measures, as adjudicated by external observers or questionnaires was only a major part of the data collection in five studies 8,9,16–18 . Each of these five studies featured a control group which received either conventional educational interventions or no intervention.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The use of performance-based outcome measures, as adjudicated by external observers or questionnaires was only a major part of the data collection in five studies. 8,9,[16][17][18] Each of these five studies featured a control group which received either conventional educational interventions or no intervention. All studies using performance-based outcome measures reported significant improvement in favour of simulation other than Lee, Baird, 17 where no significant difference was found.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Simulation‐based education for medical radiation students: A scoping review

Chau

Arruzza

Johnson

2022

J of Medical Radiation Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Simulation-based education is a significant aspect of teaching clinical skills in tertiary medical radiation science programmes, allowing students to experience the clinical setting in a safe environment. As an educational tool, simulation exists in many valid forms including role play, interprofessional simulation and virtual reality simulation. This scoping review looks at the current literature in this field to identify the evidence surrounding simulation-based education for medical radiation students. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence-based guide for educators, identify gaps in the literature and suggest areas of future research. Data extraction was performed on 33 articles where the interventions could be categorised into either role play simulation, virtual simulation, simulation videos or online learning environments. Most studies demonstrated that simulation could improve clinical competence and increase preparedness and confidence for clinical placement. Student satisfaction remained high throughout the studies; however, it is the view of many that although simulation-based education is a valid and effective tool, it is complementary to and not a replacement for clinical placement.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%