Cu-Enhanced Efficient Förster Resonance Energy Transfer in PBSA Sunscreen-Associated Ternary Cu_xCd_1–xS Quantum Dots

Abstract

Quantum dots (QDs) are semiconducting nanocrystals that exhibit size- and composition-dependent optical and electronic properties. Recently, Cu-based II–VI ternary Cu x Cd 1– x S (CCS) QDs have emerged as a promising class of QDs as compared to their binary counterparts (CuS and CdS). Herein, a series of ternary CCS QDs are synthesized by changing the molar concentration of Cu 2+ ions only keeping the 1:1 ratio of the stoichiometric mixture of Cd 2+ and S 2– . These CCS QDs are attached to 2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid (PBSA), an eminent UV-B filter widely used in many commercial sunscreen products to avoid skin erythema and DNA mutagenic photolesions. The photoinduced Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is investigated from PBSA to CCS QDs as a function of Cu concentration in CCS QDs using the steady-state photoluminescence and time-resolved photoluminescence measurements. A 2-fold increase in the magnitude of non-radiative energy transfer rate ( K T ( r ) ) is observed as the molar concentration of Cu in CCS QDs increases from 2 to 10 mM. Our findings suggest that in PBSA-CCS QD dyads, the FRET occurrence from PBSA to QDs is dictated by the dynamic mode of photoluminescence (PL) quenching. The bimolecular PL quenching rate constants ( k q ) estimated by Stern–Volmer’s plots for PBSA-CCS QD dyads are of the order of 10 10 M –1 s –1 , which signifies that in the PBSA-CCS QD dyad FRET system, the process of PL quenching is entirely diffusion-controlled.

Enhancing the FRET by tuning the bandgap of acceptor ternary ZnCdS quantum dots

“…42) and 64.05%. 44 It is evident from Table 2 that MAA functionalized ZnCdS QDs coupled with ensulizole have a high value of energy dissipation through the nonradiative FRET pathway. The FRET mechanism is exceedingly distance-dependent, so it facilitates the assessment of the distance between donor and acceptor moieties.…”

“…47 Afterward, the molar absorption coefficient of QDs was estimated from the slope of the line by plotting absorption verses concentrations as mentioned in our previously reported work. 44…”