2010
DOI: 10.1021/ja106254h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cu2Se Nanoparticles with Tunable Electronic Properties Due to a Controlled Solid-State Phase Transition Driven by Copper Oxidation and Cationic Conduction

Abstract: Stoichiometric copper(I) selenide nanoparticles have been synthesized using the hot injection method. The effects of air exposure on the surface composition, crystal structure, and electronic properties were monitored using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and conductivity measurements. The current-voltage response changes from semiconducting to ohmic, and within a week a 3000-fold increase in conductivity is observed under ambient conditions. The enhanced electronic properties can be expla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

34
327
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
34
327
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the empirical relation for the band gap, E g =2eS max T max , and our Seebeck coefficient data [24] , the band gap energy is estimated to be 0.72 eV for the sample Cu 2 Se_Nano_nl, and 0.83 eV for the sample Cu 2 Se_Nano_l. Both values are relatively lower than the band gap energy of nano-Cu 2 Se reported by Riha et al [25] . The wide 11 range in observed band gap energies and different electronic behaviors in our samples compared to the literature might be due to differences in the Cu to Se stoichiometry, large grain size distributions, and grain size effects in the compound [26] .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Using the empirical relation for the band gap, E g =2eS max T max , and our Seebeck coefficient data [24] , the band gap energy is estimated to be 0.72 eV for the sample Cu 2 Se_Nano_nl, and 0.83 eV for the sample Cu 2 Se_Nano_l. Both values are relatively lower than the band gap energy of nano-Cu 2 Se reported by Riha et al [25] . The wide 11 range in observed band gap energies and different electronic behaviors in our samples compared to the literature might be due to differences in the Cu to Se stoichiometry, large grain size distributions, and grain size effects in the compound [26] .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…[1][2][3][4] For example, both bulk and nano-scale copper selenides, despite their simple chemical formula, have very complicated crystal structures (e.g. tetragonal-, orthorhombic-, and cubic structures) and variable composition (Cu 2-x Se, 0≤x≤1), which offer an incredible wealth of properties for diverse applications such as thermoelectric conversion, lithium-ion battery, photocatalysis, quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells, and photoacoustic imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is the cuprous selenide (Cu 2 Se) nanoparticles, which are easily oxidized into non-stoichiometric Cu 1.8 Se, and become into surprisingly good p-type semiconductor with over 3000 times of enhancements in electrical conductivity. [2] In order to tune the properties of nano-scale copper selenides, a number of techniques and strategies, such as hydro-or solvo-thermal approach, [2,15,16] sonochemistry, [17] electrochemical-deposition, [18] microwave-assistant route, [19] ball milling technique, [6] and chemical welding method, [5] have been developed to prepare nanocrystals, [20] nanotubes/wires, [15,[21][22][23] nanocages, [24] dendrimers, [16,25] and nanosheets [26] with well-defined size, morphology, crystal structure, and composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transition-metal chalcogenides semiconductors such as CdS, 27,28 Cu 2 S, 29 CuInS 2 , 30 CdSe, [31][32][33][34] Cu 2 Se, [35][36][37][38][39] Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 40 and heterojunction research of CdSe/TiO 2 NTAs focuses mainly on the formation of single-junction nano-materials, which generally use co-sensitization structure has demonstrated greater efficiency than the corresponding single-junction photoanodes. 43,44 Merging the 4 multilayered narrow-band-gap and the TiO 2 large-band-gap semiconductors can result in the formation of multi-heterostructures and 5 produce a novel photocatalyst with continuously changed band gap, thereby effectively enhancing the photoresponse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far there are several interesting 7 reports on using Cu 2 Se as an absorber material in photovoltaic devices. [35][36][37][38][39]45 A widely varying range of band gap energy for Cu 2 Se 8 from indirect band gap of 1.1-1.5 eV to direct band gap of 2.0-2.3 eV have been reported. The ability to tailor the band gap energy is 9 directly related to its capability of microscopic controls in composition and structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%