2009
DOI: 10.5744/florida/9780813033693.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cuba in the Shadow of Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The German-speaking fertility pattern is unique compared to other low fertility settings in Europe due to its high rates of childlessness but relatively high progressions to second and third birth rates (Sobotka 2008). Recent research suggests that institutional factors, such as family and labor market policies, likely explain the “Western European fertility divide” between Germany and other Western countries (Klüsener et al 2013), and that Germany and Austria—along with the other Axis powers, Italy and Japan—experienced cultural and institutional responses to the war that have negatively impacted their fertility levels (Weinreb and Johnson-Hanks 2014). Germany and Austria, like other first-wave developers, exhibited population age structures conducive to gender equity change in the mid-20 th century; however, unlike places such as Sweden and the US, the institutional, cultural, and economic factors promoting greater gender equity were not present in Germany and Austria during their “gender-equity dividend”.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The German-speaking fertility pattern is unique compared to other low fertility settings in Europe due to its high rates of childlessness but relatively high progressions to second and third birth rates (Sobotka 2008). Recent research suggests that institutional factors, such as family and labor market policies, likely explain the “Western European fertility divide” between Germany and other Western countries (Klüsener et al 2013), and that Germany and Austria—along with the other Axis powers, Italy and Japan—experienced cultural and institutional responses to the war that have negatively impacted their fertility levels (Weinreb and Johnson-Hanks 2014). Germany and Austria, like other first-wave developers, exhibited population age structures conducive to gender equity change in the mid-20 th century; however, unlike places such as Sweden and the US, the institutional, cultural, and economic factors promoting greater gender equity were not present in Germany and Austria during their “gender-equity dividend”.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palloni & Pinto 2014), Cuba is different because the Revolution promised its population state‐provided support throughout their lives (Eckstein 1994: 31‐5). However, in post‐Soviet Cuba, people's trust in state‐secured futures has been replaced for many by a sense of ‘futurelessness’, an impression that, in post‐Soviet society, there is ‘absolutely nothing’ (Rosenberg Weinreb 2009: 214). Still, my interlocutors’ experiences show that instead of issues such as employment, education, and political activism, all historically central to state understandings of a Revolutionary future (Eckstein 1994: 34‐5; L.M.…”
Section: Kinship Futuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education, which in many contexts provides disadvantaged individuals with possibilities for a wealthier life (e.g. Johnson 2018), is not an option for most Cubans, since it has largely lost its significance as an enabler of social and economic mobility (Rosenberg Weinreb 2009: 4‐5). Instead, in common with in other parts of the Caribbean (Brennan 2004; Padilla 2007), sexual, love, and kin relations may allow individuals to gain forms of economic and geographical mobility, while simultaneously being affectively complex (Andaya 2014: 115‐36; Fernandez 2019; Roland 2011).…”
Section: Love Kinship and Views Of The Future In Revolutionary Cubamentioning
confidence: 99%