1988
DOI: 10.1080/01688638808402815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cube copying after cerebral damage

Abstract: The capacity of patients with cerebral lesions to copy a picture of a cube, as opposed to a nonrepresentational figure of similar structural complexity, was examined. Patients with copying disability showed greater impairment for the cube than the noncube whereas patients without copying impairment and controls performed equally on the two figures. It was concluded that the copying-deficit patients had particular difficulty in drawing 3-dimensional figures and that the copying deficit was not simply one of for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the opposite pattern of results with cube copying reflected the fact that patients with VSN drew fewer segments and therefore tended to give up sooner than SCs. These data support the view that cube copying is of particular difficulty for patients with RH brain damage, because they have specific difficulties in re-creating the third dimension (Griffiths, Cook, & Newcombe, 1988). In fact, the present data suggest that these difficulties were restricted to patients with posterior RH brain damage, because no significant correlations were found for frontal/subcortical patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In contrast, the opposite pattern of results with cube copying reflected the fact that patients with VSN drew fewer segments and therefore tended to give up sooner than SCs. These data support the view that cube copying is of particular difficulty for patients with RH brain damage, because they have specific difficulties in re-creating the third dimension (Griffiths, Cook, & Newcombe, 1988). In fact, the present data suggest that these difficulties were restricted to patients with posterior RH brain damage, because no significant correlations were found for frontal/subcortical patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…11,37,38 The name and address delayed recall test appears to be a particularly sensitive measure in AD. 44,45 Both the AD and FTD groups performed well on this component, reflecting the very mild nature of the dementia in this cohort. 39 Additionally, letter-based fluency depends upon phonologic processing and category-based fluency on semantic memory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Visual reasoning: Picture Completion (WAIS-III) [79]. Executive cognitive functions: D-KEFS Colour Word Interference Test parts 3 & 4 [77], Digit Span (WAIS-III) [79] and Trail Making Test B [75]. All D-KEFS and WAIS-III scores were age-adjusted.…”
Section: Baseline Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…score of 10 points) [78] and Block Design (WAIS-III) [79]. Verbal abstraction: Similarities (WAIS-III) [79]. Visual reasoning: Picture Completion (WAIS-III) [79].…”
Section: Baseline Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation