The purpose of this work is to contribute to the body of knowledge on processes by which students develop interdisciplinary understanding of contents, as well as to suggest technology-enhanced means for supporting them in these processes in the context of higher education. In doing so, we suggest a rethinking of three traditional practices that tend to characterise typical higher education instruction:(1) compartmentalisation of disciplines; (2) traditional pedagogy; and (3) traditional hierarchies based on levels of expertise. Our high-level conjecture was that meaningful dialogue with peers and experts supports both the deepening of ideas in one knowledge domain and the formation of connections between ideas from several domains, both of which are required for the development of interdisciplinary understanding. We developed the Boundary Breaking for Interdisciplinary Learning (BBIL) model, which harnesses technology to break boundaries between disciplines, learners and organisational levels of hierarchy. Findings indicate that 36 undergraduate students who participated in an interdisciplinary online course that implemented the BBIL model have significantly improved their interdisciplinary understanding of the course contents. This study illustrates how innovative use of available, free and low-cost technology can produce a 'positive disruption' in higher education instruction.Keywords: interdisciplinary learning; interdisciplinary understanding; learning community; cognitive apprenticeship; technology-enhanced learning; instructional design; higher education; online education Introduction The 21st century and the 'knowledge revolution' pose challenges that demand different ways of thinking and the development of new skills. One of the critical skills is the ability to think and integrate knowledge across disciplines and to understand the relations between fields of knowledge (Frodeman 2010). Developing such an interdisciplinary understanding requires a learning process through which learners integrate insights and modes of thinking from a number of disciplines to advance their understanding of a topic which is beyond the scope of a single discipline. Boix-Mansilla (2010) refers to such a learning process as interdisciplinary learning. But when we turn to higher education institutions, as key players in preparing young people to cope with the challenges that this century poses, we find that although there are theories and pedagogical approaches that have the potential to promote interdisciplinary learning, it seems that current academic organisational structures are typically geared towards instruction that compartmentalises disciplines, instead of providing students with the *Corresponding author. Email: adi.kidron@edtech.haifa.ac.il Responsible Editor: Carlo Perrotta, University of Leeds, United Kingdom. (page number not for citation purpose) tools for integrating knowledge (Salomon 1991). In fact, it is argued (e.g. by Christensen et al. 2011) that colleges and universities are in the midst of a complex cri...