2004
DOI: 10.1080/0142569042000236943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural capital: objective probability and the cultural arbitrary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the awarding of capital entails a reciprocal obligation, thus intrinsically connecting the exchange to social inequality and relations of power (Moore, 2004). In terms of the current study, the coaches appeared to strike a 'deal' with themselves; Sean would be included as long as they and the programme could be associated with his likely success.…”
Section: Tolerating Seanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the awarding of capital entails a reciprocal obligation, thus intrinsically connecting the exchange to social inequality and relations of power (Moore, 2004). In terms of the current study, the coaches appeared to strike a 'deal' with themselves; Sean would be included as long as they and the programme could be associated with his likely success.…”
Section: Tolerating Seanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a development can be linked to Bourdieu's notion of exchange (Moore, 2004). Here, the awarding of capital entails a reciprocal obligation, thus intrinsically connecting the exchange to social inequality and relations of power (Moore, 2004).…”
Section: Tolerating Seanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no necessary correlation between formal (school-based) literacy and social or economic empowerment (see, e.g., Aikman, 1999), and in circumstances where this remains the case, there is little incentive for its acquisition. Although it is important to note that both positive and negative attitudes were expressed by participants across the age range in this study, it should be recollected that the structure of cultural capital is provided by meanings and values that are relational rather than intrinsic (Moore, 2004). In a context in which group membership can be inferred through nonadherence to mainstream cultural codes, it would appear that cultural capital is liable to be manifested in the form of an absence of certain elements that constitute the capital of the surrounding society.…”
Section: Literacy In English Gypsy Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robinson and Kerr (2009) show how symbolic violence becomes a way of conceptualizing legitimate domination, where structural domination is misrecognized by followers as 'charm', or 'as the attributes of the 'natural leader' (Robinson & Kerr, 2009, p. 881).They have also examined how symbolic violence in banking came to be maintained by 'economic violence' which in turn counted as symbolic capital outside the organization; thus symbolic violence truly becomes a relationship of domination (Kerr & Robinson, 2012). Besides the educational context (Moore, 2004), the concept of a 'cultural arbitrary' is beginning to generate some interest in organization studies. For example, Kamoche and Pinnington (2012) have examined the ideological underpinnings of organizational spirituality through the lens of symbolic violence, with reference to the cultural arbitrary of managerial power and the effects of pedagogy.…”
Section: Bourdieusian Symbolic Violencementioning
confidence: 99%