Cultural Determinants of Corporate Governance: A Multi-Country Study

Abstract

Double Blind Review System Scientific Editor Ilan AvrichirPurpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate if the culture of countries influences earnings management practices. Earnings management (EM) was chosen as a Corporate Governance mechanism. Methodology: We selected the Earnings Management proxies from Leuz et al. (2003). We adopted Hosftede´s cultural dimensions: power distance, individualism, uncertainty avoidance and long term orientation. The sample comprised companies listed in 2016 in the stock markets of Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Peru, and the United States. This work involved regression analysis to associate the dimensions of culture with the practice of EM of the firms. Findings: The results showed a positive relationship between EM and power distance and between EM and uncertainty avoidance. On the other hand, the results showed a negative relationship between EM and individualism and between EM and long term orientation. Overall, our results suggest that culture influences firms' earnings management. Originality/value: Finance literature has had difficulty in assessing which variables can affect the development of CG in companies and its peculiarities in each country. It is also difficult to find country-level variables that are common to all countries. This paper breaks new ground by developing culture indicators of the countries and aggregating legal and firm-level variables to these indicators to advance the understanding of CG in the firms and nations. Theoretical and methodological contributions: studying culture at a multi-country level is important to improve the understanding of common aspects and the countries' particularities that may affect the relationship between corporate governance and performance around the world.

Insights on measuring China’s new national culture from leaders of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

“…Taras et al, 2012). As culture affects a country’s governance system (Melo Arantes et al, 2020), it is likely technology has a significant role to play in that connection.…”

Long-term orientation and the passage of time: Is it time to revisit Hofstede’s cultural dimensions?

“…Cultural studies have been applied to many arenas in an effort to grasp the effects of culture on individuals, organizations, and nations. Culture has been shown to influence many aspects of society and business, such as materialism and life satisfaction (Xiao and Tessema, 2019), corporate governance practices (Melo et al, 2020), financial literacy (Ahunov and Van Hove, 2020), innovation (Diaz-Moriana et al, 2020), and risk-taking behavior (Díez-Esteban et al, 2019). Geert Hofstede’s (1980) cultural dimensions are one of the most influential and most studied models of cultural differences among nations (Gupta et al, 2018; Kirkman et al, 2006; Leung and Morris, 2015; Osland and Bird, 2000; Peterson and Sondergaard, 2011), and they have unquestionably had a large influence on academic studies and the business world (e.g.…”