2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural Differences in Visual Contents in Picture Books

Abstract: Previous studies investigating cultural differences in attention and perception have shown that individuals from Western countries (e. g., the U.S.) perceive more analytically whereas individuals from East Asian countries (e.g., Japan) perceive more holistically (e.g., Nisbett and Miyamoto, 2005). These differences have been shown in children as young as 3 years old (Kuwabara and Smith, 2016). To reflect cultural influences on cognition, specifically on attention and perception, this study investigated potenti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond such differences in social practices and their implications for social learning, it would be of particular relevance to determine what other mechanisms might play a role in the development of attention in various cultures, including the motivational and functional implications associated with specific attentional styles in a given cultural context, to further understand the complex and dynamic process (Miyamoto, 2013) that sets off the culturally variable trajectories leading to the differences found in adults. For example, there is evidence that physical environments vary across cultures in the sense that Japanese environments tend to be visually more crowded and complex than U.S.-American environments (Kuwabara et al, 2020; Miyamoto et al, 2006). As indicated by priming studies, this might be a further factor shaping attentional routines as the exposure to more complex Japanese scenes promotes a more holistic attention style than less complex U.S.-American scenes (Miyamoto et al, 2006; Ueda & Komiya, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond such differences in social practices and their implications for social learning, it would be of particular relevance to determine what other mechanisms might play a role in the development of attention in various cultures, including the motivational and functional implications associated with specific attentional styles in a given cultural context, to further understand the complex and dynamic process (Miyamoto, 2013) that sets off the culturally variable trajectories leading to the differences found in adults. For example, there is evidence that physical environments vary across cultures in the sense that Japanese environments tend to be visually more crowded and complex than U.S.-American environments (Kuwabara et al, 2020; Miyamoto et al, 2006). As indicated by priming studies, this might be a further factor shaping attentional routines as the exposure to more complex Japanese scenes promotes a more holistic attention style than less complex U.S.-American scenes (Miyamoto et al, 2006; Ueda & Komiya, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may thus be critical for future research in developmental science, to take into account different attention systems ( Posner and Petersen, 1990 ; Raz and Buhle, 2006 ) and to identify different developmental processes that shape different facets of human visual attention across cultures ( Köster and Kärtner, 2019 ). For instance, it is important to better understand early visual experiences children are exposed to in different cultures ( Miyamoto et al, 2006 ; see also Kuwabara et al, 2020 ), but also specific social interaction experiences, which may lead to different developmental pathways ( Keller and Kärtner, 2013 ). For example, the way close others structure children’s visual attention in early development and thereby adjust their attentional focus to different elements of the physical and social environment ( Köster and Kärtner, 2018 ; Rogoff, 2003 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural products allow people to embody and manifest their culture (Morling & Lamoreaux, 2008). For example, in conference posters in academia (Wang et al, 2012), visual contents in picture books (Kuwabara et al, 2020), profile images on social media (Huang & Park, 2013), laypeople’s artworks under experimental setting (Ishii et al, 2014; Masuda, Gonzalez, et al, 2008; Senzaki et al, 2014), and city environments (Miyamoto et al, 2006). Regarding the appreciation of visual arts, a cultural-match effect has been suggested: People tend to appreciate artworks from the same culture more than they appreciate artworks from a different culture (Bao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Art Appreciationmentioning
confidence: 99%