2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(01)91927-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural diversity and biological unity in dyslexia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
246
0
18

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(287 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
23
246
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the course of years of extensive experience in extracting invariant information from visual word stimuli, perceptual processes are progressively reorganized, but only in those who become skilled readers. Research with dyslexic adults indicates that, among other areas, the VWFA fails to increase its activity in response to word forms [44,45] (Box 3). A basic functional anatomical model of the typical development of this specialization might provide a framework for the investigation and treatment of atypical development, as in the case of developmental dyslexia.…”
Section: V4 V4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the course of years of extensive experience in extracting invariant information from visual word stimuli, perceptual processes are progressively reorganized, but only in those who become skilled readers. Research with dyslexic adults indicates that, among other areas, the VWFA fails to increase its activity in response to word forms [44,45] (Box 3). A basic functional anatomical model of the typical development of this specialization might provide a framework for the investigation and treatment of atypical development, as in the case of developmental dyslexia.…”
Section: V4 V4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adults with a history of developmental dyslexia demonstrate a reduced tendency to activate VWFA (see Fig. I), among other regions, in response to visual words and pseudowords as measured by fMRI [44,45] and MEG responses within the first 200 ms [14]. Such differences have not yet been associated with neuropathology in this region, but may instead reflect the absence of a specialization that accrues over the course of years of successful reading experience [55].…”
Section: Box 3 Vwfa In Developmental Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while phonological impairments are indeed found in a clear majority of the studies (Melby-Lervag, Lyster, & Hulme, 2012;Ramus & Ahissar, 2012;Ziegler & Goswami, 2005), the presumption of an etiological and causal role for these phonological problems in relation to reading is not without its critics (Blomert & Willems, 2010;Castles & Coltheart, 2004). Most importantly, there is evidence for a double dissociation between dyslexia and phonological deficits: some individuals with Serial-order learning in dyslexia severe reading disability do not show a phonological impairment, while some children with an apparent phonological deficit nevertheless do achieve fluency in (word) reading (Paulesu et al, 2001;Wimmer, Mayringer, & Landerl, 2000). Moreover, it is unclear how some of the nonlinguistic impairments often associated with dyslexia (e.g., implicit learning or motor deficits) may be accounted for by phonological deficits.…”
Section: Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boatman et al (1997) have reported in five patients that the stimulation of one temporal electrode in this region elicited a deficit in syllable discrimination. The more posterior part of the temporal region is also activated when phonological representations are accessed through devices other than auditory input, such as lip reading (Calvert and Campbell, 2003;Calvert et al, 1997), word generation (Buchsbaum et al, 2001;Wise et al, 2001), sign language processing (Petitto et al, 2000), and reading (Paulesu et al, 2000(Paulesu et al, , 2001. It is possible that top-down attention amplifies those speech representation, thus bringing knowledge of the characteristics of a human voice to supplement the poverty of the sinewave input and integrate its acoustical features into phonemic representations.…”
Section: Fmrimentioning
confidence: 99%