“…Not surprisingly, a whole body of recent scholarship has sought to analyse and interpret various aspects of the heritage destruction unleashed by the IS. These have included: the failure of state bodies and multinational agencies to effectively respond to, and mitigate against, such destruction (Al Quntar and Daniels, 2016;Brodie, 2015); efforts to interpret the complex religious and ideological doctrine that underpins the virulent iconoclasm of the IS (Harmans¸ah, 2015;Isakhan and Zarandona, 2018); the role of heritage destruction in indoctrinating new recruits and binding them to the IS cause (Campion, 2017;Shahab and Isakhan, 2018); the extent to which the targeting of specific heritage sites formed part of their broader genocidal pogroms against besieged minorities (Bevan, 2016(Bevan, [2006; Isakhan, 2018); the IS attacks on heritage sites as a proxy for their rejection of 'western' imperialism and the vast symbolic nation building campaigns of various dictatorial regimes (de Cesari, 2015); the IS use of social media to present their heritage destruction as dramatic spectacles to local, regional and global audiences (Cunliffe and Curini, 2018;Smith et al, 2016); and the extent to which heritage reconstruction across Syria and Iraq can be utilised as part of a broader post-conflict peacebuilding process (Isakhan and Meskell, 2019;Lostal and Cunliffe, 2016).…”