2016
DOI: 10.1080/17567505.2016.1172781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cultural heritage that heals: factoring in cultural heritage discourses in the Syrian peacebuilding process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We welcome any assistance with reconstruction from those countries that were not part of the aggression on Syria … The countries that offer only conditional assistance or continue to support terrorism, they are neither invited nor welcome to help. (Reuters, 2018) A growing body of research supports the idea that the management of cultural heritage resources can play an important role in peacebuilding and reconstruction in post-conflict contexts (Isakhan and Meskell, 2019;Lostal and Cunliffe, 2016;Meskell, 2018;Munawar, 2018). However, as I argued above, the reconstruction of Aleppo's cultural heritage sites might be seen as a politically motivated process to maintain the Assad regime's dominance.…”
Section: Colonizing Post-war Syriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We welcome any assistance with reconstruction from those countries that were not part of the aggression on Syria … The countries that offer only conditional assistance or continue to support terrorism, they are neither invited nor welcome to help. (Reuters, 2018) A growing body of research supports the idea that the management of cultural heritage resources can play an important role in peacebuilding and reconstruction in post-conflict contexts (Isakhan and Meskell, 2019;Lostal and Cunliffe, 2016;Meskell, 2018;Munawar, 2018). However, as I argued above, the reconstruction of Aleppo's cultural heritage sites might be seen as a politically motivated process to maintain the Assad regime's dominance.…”
Section: Colonizing Post-war Syriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of research supports the idea that the management of cultural heritage resources can play an important role in peacebuilding and reconstruction in post-conflict contexts (Isakhan and Meskell, 2019; Lostal and Cunliffe, 2016; Meskell, 2018; Munawar, 2018). However, as I argued above, the reconstruction of Aleppo’s cultural heritage sites might be seen as a politically motivated process to maintain the Assad regime’s dominance.…”
Section: Colonizing Post-war Syriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 Lostal and Cunliffe, as well as Gottlieb, tentatively suggest cultural destruction could be factored into reparations and truth-seeking mechanisms. 22 The incorporation of cultural destruction can improve TJ praxis by giving full effect to the indivisibility of human rightscivil-political, socio-economic and culturalwhile addressing the hitherto neglected issues of heritage and identity as concepts with a latent potential for both healing and disharmony in post-conflict communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, a whole body of recent scholarship has sought to analyse and interpret various aspects of the heritage destruction unleashed by the IS. These have included: the failure of state bodies and multinational agencies to effectively respond to, and mitigate against, such destruction (Al Quntar and Daniels, 2016;Brodie, 2015); efforts to interpret the complex religious and ideological doctrine that underpins the virulent iconoclasm of the IS (Harmans¸ah, 2015;Isakhan and Zarandona, 2018); the role of heritage destruction in indoctrinating new recruits and binding them to the IS cause (Campion, 2017;Shahab and Isakhan, 2018); the extent to which the targeting of specific heritage sites formed part of their broader genocidal pogroms against besieged minorities (Bevan, 2016(Bevan, [2006; Isakhan, 2018); the IS attacks on heritage sites as a proxy for their rejection of 'western' imperialism and the vast symbolic nation building campaigns of various dictatorial regimes (de Cesari, 2015); the IS use of social media to present their heritage destruction as dramatic spectacles to local, regional and global audiences (Cunliffe and Curini, 2018;Smith et al, 2016); and the extent to which heritage reconstruction across Syria and Iraq can be utilised as part of a broader post-conflict peacebuilding process (Isakhan and Meskell, 2019;Lostal and Cunliffe, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%